Abstract
We report an intriguing Poynting vortex street produced by 3D vectorial superposition of two counterpropagating modes in different mode orders on silicon-based waveguides. Importantly, this Poynting vortex street can produce composite topological textures characterized by spin skyrmion (bimeron) array overlapped with momentum vortices yielding local transverse orbital angular momentum. The transverse and longitudinal shifts of these topological textures can be controlled by modulating the relative amplitudes and phases (or frequency shift) between the counter-propagating modes, respectively. These on-chip manageable topological spin and momentum flows may open new doors to optical manipulation, classical or quantum information processing, and optofluidic techniques on integrated photonic platforms.
Full Text
On-chip Topological Spin-Momentum Flows
Liang Fang†*, Peilin Liu†, Jiayi Zhang, Jinman Chen, Qinjun Chen, and Chujun Zhao
School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
(Received XXXX; published XXXX)
We introduce photonic spin-momentum topologies on silicon-based waveguides characterized by spin skyrmion (meron-antimeron) arrays overlapped with momentum vortices that yield local transverse orbital angular momentum. These composite textures, induced by Poynting vortex streets, can be produced through superposition of two counter-propagating modes in different mode orders. Importantly, they can be dynamically controlled to undergo transverse shifting and longitudinal flow by modulating the relative amplitudes and phases (or frequencies) between the counter-propagating modes. These on-chip controllable topological spin-momentum flows may open new avenues for optical manipulation, waveguide quantum electrodynamics, and optofluidic techniques on integrated photonic platforms.
Topologically nontrivial textures refer to configurations that cannot be continuously deformed into trivial smooth shapes [1-3]. Such topological structures have increasingly advanced basic and applied research in hydrodynamics, aerodynamics, cosmology [4], mathematics, and physics [5]. For example, magnetic skyrmions as classical topological textures may find potential applications in nanoscale information storage and spintronic devices due to their topological stability [6-8]. From a wave perspective, topological structures can be readily formed in electromagnetic fields because of their rich vectorial nature, typically characterized by various vortices [9-13], Möbius strips [14,15], skyrmions or merons [16-20], and hopfions [21,22]. They can also be constructed using familiar water waves [23,24] and acoustic waves [25,26]. Particularly, as analogues of magnetic skyrmion topologies, various kinds of optical skyrmions have been uncovered by fully exploiting photonic degrees of freedom (DoFs), such as spin angular momentum (SAM) [16,19], electromagnetic vector [3,27], Poynting vector [28], and Stokes vector [29-31]. All these topological structures may offer new opportunities for applications in multidimensional or ultraprecise metrology, super-resolution imaging, versatile particle manipulation, classical and quantum information processing or communications, and beyond [32-42].
Electromagnetic fields tightly confined to the scale of their wavelengths typically manifest strong vectorial nature, as seen in highly focusing and strongly guiding scenarios [43-51]. These provide ideal platforms for constructing and studying photonic topological structures. For instance, transverse spin within tightly structured fields can form spin skyrmions [16,19]. Thus far, discovered photonic topologies have been primarily realized on free-space bulk optical systems [22,43-47], metal surfaces via surface plasmon polaritons [3,27,48-51], and 2D dielectric materials or metasurfaces [52,53]. However, little attention has been paid to the topological nature of light transmission systems on integrated photonic platforms, where electromagnetic modes strongly guided by high-index contrast waveguides exhibit three-dimensional (3D) vectorial distributions as well. These fields can also form photonic transverse spin with spin-momentum locking effects and spin singularities under evanescent field coupling [54-58].
In this letter, we first introduce an intriguing optical Poynting vortex street constructed by Poynting energy flow that features repeating swirling patterns, analogous to a classical Kármán vortex street caused by flow separation of a fluid around blunt bodies (Fig. S1 [59], [62-64]). This Poynting vortex street can be produced by electromagnetic superposition between two counter-propagating modes in different mode orders on optical waveguide platforms [59]. Surprisingly, we find that it can inherently generate composite spin-momentum topologies containing spin skyrmions overlapped with momentum vortices (Fig. 1 [FIGURE:1]). The latter can further yield local transverse orbital angular momentum (OAM) perpendicular to the modal propagation directions. Note that beyond conventional standing waves with nodes and antinodes from destructive and constructive interference, the counter-propagating 3D waveguide mode superpositions in different mode orders produce no nodes and antinodes—instead generating these intriguing topological textures. It is worth emphasizing that these resulting composite topological spin-momentum structures possess remarkable advantages compared with those on other photonic platforms. One is controllability that can be easily realized by modulating the relative amplitudes and phases (or frequencies) between the counter-propagating modes. The other is the silicon-based platform capability to produce near-field topologies that may open new opportunities for developing on-chip light-matter interactions, waveguide quantum electrodynamics, versatile optical manipulation, and optofluidic techniques [65-68].
The Poynting momentum of electromagnetic fields can be divided into canonical (orbital) and spin momentum parts [70,71], i.e., $\mathbf{P} = \mathbf{P}_o + \mathbf{P}_s$, where $\mathbf{P} = \text{Re}(\mathbf{E}^ \times \mathbf{H})/(2c^2)$ is the Poynting momentum, $\mathbf{P}_o = \text{Im}[\varepsilon\mathbf{E}^ \cdot (\nabla)\mathbf{E} + \mu\mathbf{H}^ \cdot (\nabla)\mathbf{H}]/(4\omega)$ is the canonical momentum, $\mathbf{P}_s = \nabla \times \mathbf{S}/2$ is the spin momentum, and $\mathbf{S} = \text{Im}[\varepsilon\mathbf{E}^ \times \mathbf{E} + \mu\mathbf{H}^* \times \mathbf{H}]/(4\omega)$ is the SAM density. Here $\omega$ denotes the angular frequency of the electromagnetic fields, $c$ is the speed of light in a medium, and $\varepsilon$ and $\mu$ denote the absolute permittivity and permeability of the medium, respectively. The transverse spin within electromagnetic guided waves satisfies the spin-momentum relationship [50]. We have verified that such relationship also holds for the case of counter-propagating electromagnetic mode superposition [59]. Therefore, the on-chip photonic spin and canonical momentum densities, both associated with the Poynting vortex street, can be respectively described as:
$$\mathbf{P}_o = \mathbf{P} + \dots$$
where $k = \omega/c$ is the wave number. Actually, these SAM and orbital momentum of the evanescent fields meet a direct spin-momentum relationship, i.e., $\nabla^2\mathbf{S} + 4k^2\mathbf{S} = 2\nabla \times \mathbf{P}_o$.
FIG. 2 [FIGURE:2]. Local transverse OAM arrays induced by Poynting vortex street. (a) Electric and (b) magnetic parts of the canonical momentum, respectively. The red circles indicate the circulating directions of canonical momentum vortex cells. The background represents the phase distributions of the electric field component ($E_z$) in (a) and the magnetic component ($H_y$) in (b).
FIG. 1. Schematic of topological spin-momentum flows on a silicon chip. (a) and (b) Upward and downward spin-momentum cells enlarged from A and B in the topological flows shown in (c). (c) The produced on-chip Poynting vortex street and spin meron-antimeron texture, which can be dynamically controlled to transverse shift and longitudinal flow by modulating the amplitude ratios and phase (or frequency) differences between the counter-propagating TM0 and TM1 modes, respectively.
Here we focus on transverse-magnetic (TM) modes because of their more considerable evanescent electric fields compared to transverse-electric modes that are available outside the waveguides. We first investigate the vectorial dynamics of the superposed electromagnetic fields ($\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{H}$) between two counter-propagating TM modes in different mode orders and polarization ellipses [59]. The dynamical 3D electric field oscillations are shown in Movie 1. Unlike uniform elliptic planes of paraxial polarized light, the polarization ellipses given by 3D field superposition over time manifest as inhomogeneous distributions containing L lines (Figs. S4 [59]). The normal vectors of these elliptic planes intuitively determine the spin textures with fractional skyrmion numbers. As mentioned above, the Poynting vortex street manifests as periodical vortex pairs with opposite handedness resulting from the superposition dislocation of counter-propagating modes in different orders. These energy vortices can associate with topological stability because of their lowest energy states at the singularities [69]. Details of mathematical derivations and additional calculation results are presented in [59]. Here the electromagnetic fields were numerically calculated by the Finite-Difference Time-Domain method at a wavelength of 1550 nm. The silicon waveguide with 0.22 μm thickness and 1.2 μm width is placed on a silicon dioxide (SiO$_2$) substrate [Fig. 1(c)]. The monitor position is 0.025 μm above the air-waveguide interface.
From Eq. (1), on the one hand, the Poynting vortex pairs with opposite handedness contribute to topological spin textures with opposite fractional skyrmion numbers (Fig. 1). The topological number of spin skyrmion textures can be calculated as:
$$Q = \frac{1}{4\pi} \iint \mathbf{n} \cdot \left(\frac{\partial\mathbf{n}}{\partial x} \times \frac{\partial\mathbf{n}}{\partial y}\right) dx dy,$$
where $\mathbf{n} = \mathbf{S}/|\mathbf{S}|$ denotes the 3D unit vector. For the counter-propagating TM0 and TM1 mode superposition with equal amplitudes, the skyrmion numbers of the resulting spin textures with closed units are $\pm 1/2$, referring to bimerons (meron-antimeron) [Fig. 3 FIGURE:3]. The relation between $s_z$ and $p_\phi$ components within these cells is governed by the right-hand screw rule [Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)].
On the other hand, from Eq. (2), this Poynting vortex street naturally yields local canonical momentum vortices that circulate with opposite handedness in the upper and lower rows [Fig. 2]. The topological charge of the vortices is defined as:
$$q = \frac{1}{2\pi} \oint_C d\Psi,$$
where $\Psi$ is the orientation angle of momentum vectors in the $x$-$y$ plane, and $C$ is a closed path around the singularities in the counterclockwise direction. Accordingly, the topological charge of these vortices can be calculated as $q = +1$. Note that anti-vortices ($q = -1$) also exist between two vortices with singularities marked by red dots in the same rows (Fig. S3(C) [59]).
When choosing the displacement ($\mathbf{r}_i$) from the vortex centers (singularities) as coordinate origins, each canonical momentum vortex cell yields a local transverse OAM perpendicular to the waveguide surface, with its integral value given by:
$$\langle \mathbf{L}_i \rangle = \iint \mathbf{r}_i \times \mathbf{P}_o dA_i,$$
where $A_i$ is the integral domain covering the vortex cells denoted by $i$ [Fig. 2]. Here the electric transverse OAM is much larger than the magnetic transverse OAM under the broken electromagnetic distributional symmetry in the highly guiding condition [59]. Such transverse OAM from the electric part is determined by the local helical phase of the dominant $E_z$ component [Movie 1], while its magnetic counterpart is determined by the $H_y$ component [Fig. 2], arising from the dislocation superposition of counter-propagating TM modes in different orders. Notably, the phase singularities of the dominant vertical electric component correspond to conventional nodes, also aligning with the centers of Poynting vortices with lowest energy (Fig. S3 [59]).
Despite the existing local transverse OAM array, the overall integral transverse OAM over the superposition region is zero because the local OAM cells with opposite directions in upper and lower rows cancel each other. Nevertheless, this near-field transverse OAM may be utilized for on-chip optical manipulation, such as driving particle rotation [72,73].
FIG. 3. Controllable skyrmion numbers and transverse shifts of topological spin-momentum texture. (a) The 3D spin vectors within alterable skyrmion cells can be mapped from a northern or southern hemisphere starting from the pole to specific latitudes via stereographic projection. (b) The skyrmion numbers (left y-axis) and transverse distances between opposite spin skyrmions (right y-axis) versus the amplitude ratios $A_0/A_1$ of TM0 and TM1 modes. (c) and (d) The spin skyrmion cells with different mean skyrmion numbers and transverse shifts under $A_0/A_1 = 1$ and 0.4, respectively.
We next demonstrate the controllability of these topological structures enabled by the relative amplitudes and phases (or frequencies) between the two counter-propagating modes. The relative amplitude affects the collective distributions of the topological textures, thereby changing both the skyrmion numbers and center positions. We define a complete skyrmion cell encircled by a contour line of the angle $\alpha$ of the 3D spin vector with respect to the 2D plane that forms the maximum closed area [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. These spin skyrmions can be visually described by mapping the 3D vectors on a northern or southern hemisphere onto the defined texture regions starting from the north or south pole to a specific latitude via stereographic projection [Fig. 3(a)]. This latitude gives the fractional value of skyrmion number:
$$Q = \pm \frac{(1 - \cos\alpha)}{2},$$
which is determined by the amplitude ratios ($A_n/A_m$) of TMn to TMm modes, where the polar angles are given by $\alpha = \tan^{-1}(\sqrt{S_x^2 + S_y^2}/S_z)$ [59], and the sign '$+$' or '$-$' depends on the northern or southern hemisphere, respectively. For example, spin textures with average skyrmion numbers of about $\pm 0.50$ (bimerons) and $\pm 0.31$ given by the $0^\circ$ (equator) and $\pm 23^\circ$ latitudes on the hemispheres are presented in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), produced by counter-propagating TM0 and TM1 modes with amplitude ratios of $A_0/A_1 = 1$ and 0.4, respectively. Despite the drop-shaped boundaries, the spin textures can be quantified by the skyrmion number as a topological invariant when stereographically projected from the hemispheres. We further investigate the variable skyrmion numbers versus amplitude ratios shown as the curve (left y-axis) in Fig. 3(b), where pentagrams indicate values calculated by the angle $\alpha$, while triangles represent the defined skyrmion number via integral operation.
FIG. 4 [FIGURE:4]. Controllable longitudinal flows of topological spin-momentum textures by modulating the relative phases (or frequencies) between the counter-propagating TM0 and TM1 modes. The instantaneous spin-momentum textures at (a) $t=0$ ps, (b) $t=1.33$ ps, and (c) $t=2.67$ ps, respectively, when the frequency shift is $\Delta f = 250$ GHz.
Apart from skyrmion numbers, the relative amplitude also affects the transverse shift ($y_0$ coordinate) of the center positions or singularities ($x_0, y_0$) of the topological textures, which can be approximately deduced from:
$$\cos(k_{my}y_0 - k_{my}b/2 - \phi_m) \cos(k_{ny}y_0 - k_{ny}b/2 - \phi_n),$$
where $k_{my} \approx (m+1)\pi/b$ and $k_{ny} \approx (n+1)\pi/b$ denote the transverse wave numbers of TMm and TMn modes with orders $m$ and $n$, respectively, $\phi_m = m\pi/2$ and $\phi_n = n\pi/2$ determine modal parity distribution, and $m, n = 0, 1, 2, \dots$. The sign '$+$' corresponds to counterclockwise momentum vortices (or positive spin skyrmions) in the upper row, and vice versa [59]. The transverse distances between opposite topologies in upper and lower rows versus amplitude ratios are given by the curve (right y-axis) in Fig. 3(b). In contrast to transverse shift, the relative phases (or frequency shift) between the counter-propagating modes determine the longitudinal flow ($x_0$ coordinate) of these topological textures. For superposition with equal amplitudes, the topological center or singular positions in the upper and lower rows can be approximately given as:
$$(x_0, y_0)_{\text{up}} \approx \left[\frac{(2N+1)\pi + \beta_n L - \Delta\varphi}{\beta_n + \beta_m}, \frac{2M + m + n + 1}{(m + n + 2)}b\right],$$
$$(x_0, y_0)_{\text{down}} \approx \left[\frac{2N\pi + \beta_n L - \Delta\varphi}{\beta_n + \beta_m}, \frac{2M + m + n}{(m + n + 2)}b\right],$$
where $\beta_m$ and $\beta_n$ are the propagation constants of TMn and TMm modes, $\Delta\varphi = \Delta\varphi_0 + \Delta\omega t$ is the overall phase difference induced by the initial phase difference ($\Delta\varphi_0$) and frequency shift ($\Delta\omega$), $b$ is the waveguide width, $L$ is the distance between two modal sources, and integers $M$ and $N$ denote different topological spin-momentum cells.
Remarkably, these topological textures can be controlled to flow dynamically by simply shifting the frequency ($\Delta\omega$) of the reversely inputted modal sources. The topological spin bimeron and transverse OAM arrays are shown in Figs. 4(a)-4(c) and dynamically demonstrated in Movie 2 under a frequency shift of $\Delta f = \Delta\omega/2\pi = 250$ GHz, where the flow directions depend on the signs of frequency differences between these two modal sources. Note that the frame-by-frame pictures of dynamical electromagnetic structures in Movies 1 and 2 were obtained by subdividing the incident phases from $0$ to $2\pi$ to replace the time-dependent dynamic phases when simulating modal propagation. Additionally, we present higher-order topological distributions with more transverse periods produced by counter-propagating higher-order TM1 and TM2 modes (Fig. 5 [FIGURE:5]). These on-chip dynamical topological spin and transverse OAM textures may offer new mechanisms or degrees of freedom for optofluidic microsystems used for nanoparticle trapping or manipulation, and topology-based light-matter interactions [74-79].
FIG. 5. Higher-order topological spin-momentum flows produced by the counter-propagating TM1 and TM2 modes. (a) and (b) Poynting vortex street with vortex arrays from different viewing angles, where the singularities (red dots) of energy flow vortices form lines in 3D space. (c) and (d) The corresponding topological spin bimeron (meron-antimeron) texture with skyrmion numbers of $\pm 0.5$.
In conclusion, we demonstrated dynamical topological spin-momentum flows in the propagation system of silicon-based waveguides constructed by counter-propagating modes in different orders, beyond conventional standing waves. The spin textures with fractional skyrmion numbers (bimerons) have an intrinsic relationship with the canonical momentum vortices, both associated with Poynting vortex streets and governed by spin-momentum relationships. Naturally, the canonical momentum vortices can produce local transverse OAM that accompanies the spin merons. These on-chip near-field transverse SAM and OAM exhibit fundamental differences from well-known paraxial vortex fields carrying longitudinal OAM and SAM [70,80]. More importantly, these composite spin-momentum topologies can be dynamically moved by controlling the relative amplitudes and phases (or frequencies) between the counter-propagating modes. We expect that these on-chip controllable spin-momentum topologies in light transmission systems can expand the family of photonic topologies in micro- and nano-photonics, and pave the way toward topology-based light-matter interactions, waveguide quantum electrodynamics, and even optofluidic techniques on integrated photonic platforms.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (62275092), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (No. 2025JJ50355 and 2023JJ30114), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
*Corresponding author: liangfang@hust.edu.cn
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
References
[1] N. D. Mermin, The topological theory of defects in ordered media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 591 (1979).
[2] J. M. Kosterlitz. Nobel lecture: Topological defects and phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 040501 (2017).
[3] S. Tsesses, E. Ostrovsky, K. Cohen, B. Gjonaj, N. H. Lindner, and G. Bartal, Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields, Science 361, 993-996 (2018).
[4] T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
[5] P. Milde, D. Köhler, J. Seidel et al., Unwinding of a Skyrmion Lattice by Magnetic Monopoles, Science 340, 1076 (2013).
[6] X. Z. Yu, W. Koshibae, Y. Tokunaga, K. Shibata, Y. Taguchi, N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Transformation between meron and skyrmion in a chiral topological spin magnet, Nature, 564, 95-98 (2018).
[7] R. Cheenikundil, Z. Lu, M. Pereiro, A. Delin, and D. Thonig, Stability and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions in FM/AFM heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104430 (2024).
[8] A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017).
[9] L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185-8189 (1992).
[10] Q. Zhan, Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications, Adv. Opt. Photonics 1, 1-57 (2009).
[11] B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljačić, Topological Nature of Optical Bound States in the Continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 257401 (2014).
[12] J. Ni, C. Huang, L.-M. Zhou, M. Gu, Q. Song, Y. Kivshar, and C. Qiu, Multidimensional phase singularities in nanophotonics, Science 374, eabj0039 (2021).
[13] J. Cheng, L. Fang, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, F. Fan, L. Miao, and C. Zhao, Optical centroid ellipses beyond polarization ellipses, Optics Letters 49, 6501-6504 (2024).
[14] T. Bauer, P. Banzer, E. Karimi, et al., Observation of optical polarization Möbius strips, Science 347, 964-966 (2015).
[15] T. Bauer, M. Neugebauer, G. Leuchs, and P. Banzer, Optical Polarization Möbius Strips and Points of Purely Transverse Spin Density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 013601 (2016).
[16] L. Du, A. Yang, A. V. Zayats, X. Yuan, Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum, Nat. Phys., 15, 650-654 (2019).
[17] Y. Shen, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Free-space topological optical textures: tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics 17, 295 (2025).
[18] X. Lei, A. Yang, P. Shi, Z. Xie, L. Du, A. V. Zayats, and X. Yuan, Photonic Spin Lattices: Symmetry Constraints for Skyrmion and Meron Topologies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 237403 (2021).
[19] C. Guo, M. Xiao, Y. Guo, L. Yuan, and S. Fan, Meron Spin Textures in Momentum Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 106103 (2020).
[20] P. Dreher, A. Neuhaus, D. Janoschka, et al., Spatiotemporal topology of plasmonic spin meron pairs revealed by polarimetric photo-emission microscopy, Adv. Photonics 6, 066007 (2024).
[21] D. Sugic, R. Droop, E. Otte, et al., Particle-like topologies in light, Nat. Commun. 12, 6785 (2021).
[22] D. Marco and M. A. Alonso, 4D Topological Textures in Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 123805 (2025).
[23] Wang, B., Che, Z., Cheng, C. et al. Topological water-wave structures manipulating particles. Nature 638, 394-400 (2025).
[24] D. A. Smirnova, F. Nori, and K. Y. Bliokh, Water-Wave Vortices and Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 054003 (2024).
[25] H. Ge, X.-Y. Xu, L. Liu, et al., Observation of Acoustic Spin Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 144502 (2021).
[26] N. Zhou, W.-N. Chen, W.-J. Sun, et al., Observation of acoustic meron textures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 042204 (2024).
[27] T. J. Davis, D. Janoschka, P. Dreher, B. Frank, F.-J. Meyer zu Heringdorf, and H. Giessen, Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with deep subwavelength resolution, Science 368, eaba6415 (2020).
[28] S. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. Zheng, J. Sun, H. Cao, S. Song, Z.-L. Deng, F. Qin, Y. Cao, and X. Li, Topological Structures of Energy Flow: Poynting Vector Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 073802 (2024).
[29] W. R. Kerridge-Johns, A. S. Rao, and T. Omatsu, Optical skyrmion laser using a wedged output coupler, Optica 11, 6, 769-775 (2024).
[30] S. Gao, F. C. Speirits, F. Castellucci, S. Franke-Arnold, S. M. Barnett, and J. B. Götte, Paraxial skyrmionic beams, Phys. Rev. A 102, 053513 (2020).
[31] V. Hakobyan and E. Brasselet, Q-plates: from optical vortices to optical skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 083802 (2025).
[32] K. I. Willig, S. O. Rizzoli, V. Westphal, R. Jahn, and S. W. Hell, STED microscopy reveals that synaptotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis, Nature 440, 935-939 (2006).
[33] X. Fang, H. Ren, and M. Gu, Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption, Nat. Photon. 13, 489-496 (2019).
[34] L. Fang, Z. Wan, A. Forbes, and J. Wang, Vectorial Doppler metrology, Nat. Commun., 12, 4186 (2021).
[35] M. Cheng, W. Jiang, L. Guo, J. Li, and A. Forbes, Metrology with a twist: probing and sensing with vortex light, Light Sci. Appl 14, 4 (2025).
[36] V. Shvedov, A. R. Davoyan, C. Hnatovsky, N. Engheta, and W. Krolikowski, A long-range polarization-controlled optical tractor beam, Nat. Photon. 8, 846-850 (2014).
[37] S. Zhao, Z. Tian, C. Shen, S. Yang, J. Xia, T. Li, Z. Xie, P. Zhang, L. P. Lee, S. A. Cummer, & T. J. Huang, Topological acoustofluidics, Nat. Mater, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02169-y (2025).
[38] A. Forbes, M. de Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, Structured light, Nat. Photon. 15, 253-262 (2021).
[39] G. Ye, T. Yuan, Y. Zhang, T. Wang, and X. Zhang, Recent progress on laser interferometry based on vortex beams: Status, challenges, and perspectives, Opt. Lasers Eng. 172, 107871 (2024).
[40] L. Fang, J. Chen, Q. Chen, C. Zhao, Optical centroid orbiting metrology, Laser Photonics Rev. 19, 2402311 (2025).
[41] H. Ma, Y. Zhang, J. Zhou, et al., Infinitesimal optical singularity ruler for three-dimensional picometric metrology, Nat. Commun., 15, 10853 (2024).
[42] A. Yang, X. Lei, P. Shi, F. Meng, M. Lin, L. Du, and X. Yuan, Spin-Manipulated Photonic Skyrmion-Pair for Pico-Metric Displacement Sensing, Adv. Sci. 10, 2205249 (2023).
[43] A. J. Vernon, M. R. Dennis, and F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, 3D zeros in electromagnetic fields, Optica 10, 1231 (2023).
[44] H. Wang, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological spin defects of light, Optica 9, 1417-1423 (2022).
[45] H. Wang and S. Fan, Photonic spin hopfions and monopole loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 263801 (2023).
[46] H. Teng, J. Zhong, J. Chen, X. Lei, and Q. Zhan, Physical conversion and superposition of optical skyrmion topologies, Photonics Res. 11, 2042 (2023).
[47] X. Lei, A. Yang, X. Chen, et al., Skyrmionic spin textures in nonparaxial light, Adv. Photonics 7, 016009 (2025).
[48] Y. Dai, Z. Zhou, A. Ghosh, R. S. K. Mong, A. Kubo, C.-B. Huang and H. Petek, Plasmonic topological quasiparticle on the nanometre and femtosecond scales, Nature, 588, 616-619 (2020).
[49] P. Shi, L. Du, M. Li, and X. Yuan, Symmetry-Protected Photonic Chiral Spin Textures by Spin-Orbit Coupling, Laser Photonics Rev. 15, 2000554 (2021).
[50] P. Shi, L. Du, C. Li, A. V. Zayats, and X. Yuan, Transverse spin dynamics in structured electromagnetic guided waves, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2018816118 (2021).
[51] T. Fu, R.-Y. Zhang, S. Jia, C. T. Chan, and S. Wang, Near-Field Spin Chern Number Quantized by Real-Space Topology of Optical Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 233801 (2024).
[52] H. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Ni et al., On-chip multi-degree-of-freedom control of two-dimensional materials, Nature 632, 1038-1044 (2024).
[53] T. Li, M. Liu, J. Hou, et al., Chip-scale metaphotonic singularities: topological, dynamical, and practical aspects, Chip 3, 100109 (2024).
[54] L. Fang and J. Wang, Intrinsic transverse spin angular momentum of fiber eigenmodes, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053827 (2017).
[55] T. Van Mechelen and Z. Jacob, Universal spin-momentum locking of evanescent waves, Optica 3, 118-126 (2016).
[56] M. F. Picardi, A. V. Zayats, and F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, Janus and Huygens Dipoles: Near-Field Directionality Beyond Spin-Momentum Locking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117402 (2018).
[57] L. Fang, Y. Xiang, Q. Chen, and S. Wen, Topological spin states in 3D coupled electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013801 (2025).
[58] L. Fang and J. Wang, Emerging optical spin and chirality by three-dimensional evanescent field coupling, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063514 (2024).
[59] See Supplemental Material at xxxxx, which includes Refs. [17,50,60-62], for the theoretical derivation of superposed evanescent field expressions, 3D electromagnetic vectors and polarization ellipses; the verification of spin-momentum relationship, 3D spin and momentum components; the calculation of skyrmion numbers and center positions under different amplitude ratios; more details and numerical results of topological spin and momentum flows in terms of vortex street analogies, schematic sketch, 3D field components, superposed field distributions, topological texture evolution, theoretical verifications, and higher-order topological textures produced by counter-propagating higher-order TM modes.
[60] K. Okamoto, Fundamentals of Optical Waveguides, USA: Elsevier Academic, 2006.
[61] E. Mustafa and J. M. Cohen, Hertz and Debye potentials and electromagnetic fields in general relativity, Class. Quantum Grav. 4, 1623 (1987).
[62] P. Vadasz, von Kármán vortex streets around invisible bluff bodies, Phys. Fluids 35, 096604 (2023).
[63] Y. Shen, N. Papasimakis and N. I. Zheludev, Nondiffracting and optical "Kármán vortex streets", Nat. Commun, 15, 4863 (2024).
[64] Woo Jin Kwon, Joon Hyun Kim, Sang Won Seo, and Y. Shin, Observation of von Kármán Vortex Street in an Atomic Superfluid Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 245301 (2016).
[65] A. Kam, S. Tsesses, Y. Ilin, et al., Near-field photon entanglement in total angular momentum, Nature, 640, 634-639 (2025).
[66] A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakinskiy, and A.N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023).
[67] N. V. Sapra, K. Y. Yang, D. Vercruysse, et al., On-chip integrated laser-driven particle accelerator, Science, 367, 79-83 (2020).
[68] A. Karabchevsky, A. Katiyi, A. S. Ang, A. Hazan, On-chip nanophotonics and future challenges, Nanophotonics, 9(12), 3733-3753 (2020).
[69] Y. A. Kharkov, O. P. Sushkov, and M. Mostovoy, Bound States of Skyrmions and Merons near the Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 207201 (2017).
[70] B. Ghosh, A. Daniel, B. Gorzkowski, A. Y. Bekshaev, R. Lapkiewicz, and K. Y. Bliokh, Canonical and Poynting currents in propagation and diffraction of structured light: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 41(6), 1276-1289 (2024).
[71] K. Y. Bliokh, A. Y. Bekshaev, and F. Nori, Extraordinary Momentum and Spin in Evanescent Waves, Nat. Commun. 5, 3300 (2014).
[72] Y. Hu, J. J. Kingsley-Smith, M. Nikkhou, et al., Structured Transverse Orbital Angular Momentum Probed by a Levitated Optomechanical Sensor, Nat. Commun. 14, 2638 (2023).
[73] A. B. Stilgoe, T. A. Nieminen, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Controlled transfer of transverse orbital angular momentum to optically trapped birefringent microparticles, Nat. Photon. 15, 449-453 (2021).
[74] M. Rahman, M. Harrington, M. A. Stott, et al., Optical trapping assisted detection rate enhancement of single molecules on a nanopore optofluidic chip, Optica, 6(9), 1130-1131 (2019).
[75] H. Schmidt and A. R. Hawkins, The photonic integration of non-solid media using optofluidics, Nat. Photonics, 5(10), 598-604 (2011).
[76] L. Fang and J. Wang, Optical Trapping Separation of Chiral Nanoparticles by Subwavelength Slot Waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 233902 (2021).
[77] K. Han, T. W. LeBrun, and V. A. Aksyuk, Bound-state-in-continuum guided modes in a multilayer electro-optically active photonic integrated circuit platform, Optica, 11(5), 706-712 (2024).
[78] J. Lu, V. Ginis, C.-W. Qiu, and F. Capasso, Polarization-Dependent Forces and Torques at Resonance in a Microfiber-Microcavity System, Phys. Rev. Lett., 130, 183601 (2023).
[79] S. Linghu, Z. Gu, J. Lu, et al., Plasmon-driven nanowire actuators for on-chip manipulation, Nat. Commun., 12, 385 (2021).
[80] L. Fang, H. Wang, Y. Liang, H. Cao, and J. Wang, Spin-Orbit Mapping of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 233901 (2021).