Preamble

Improved Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry for mass measurements of exotic nuclei

Yin-Fang Luo,¹,² Jia-Hao Lv,¹,² Yuan-Ming Xing,¹,²,† Min Zhang,¹ Yu-Hu Zhang,¹,² Meng Wang,¹,² Yury A. Litvinov,¹,³ and Xiao-Hong Zhou¹,²
¹State Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Science and Technology, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
²School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
³GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany

The technique of Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry (Bρ-IMS), established at a storage ring, serves as a valuable tool for determining the masses of short-lived nuclei. In previous Bρ-IMS experiments, the effects of magnetic field drifts had to be corrected to improve the mass resolving power of Bρ-IMS [Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 27 (2023)]. The correction procedures are complicated and require multiple reference ions with well-known masses in each injection, which may not be feasible in measurements of exotic nuclei with tiny production yields. In this study, we propose a novel approach to Bρ-IMS that requires only one reference ion for mass determination in an individual injection, avoiding the tedious and complicated correction procedures. This approach achieves mass precision comparable to previous Bρ-IMS results and is proven suitable for future mass measurements of exotic nuclei with extremely low production yields.

Keywords: Storage ring, Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry, Double time-of-flight (TOF) detectors, Nucleus mass measurement

Introduction

Isochronous mass spectrometry (IMS) conducted at the Cooler Storage Ring for experiment (CSRe) in Lanzhou, China, has emerged as a pivotal technology for nuclear mass determination. This method has yielded numerous new mass values [1–7], establishing itself as an essential tool in nuclear mass spectrometry [8–10].

Early IMS experiments relied on measuring the revolution times (T) of stored ions, achieving high resolving power only for ion species with limited mass-to-charge ratios (m/q) that satisfied the isochronous condition γ = γt [11]. Here, γ is the relativistic Lorentz factor of the ion, and γt is the transition point, an ion-optical quantity of the ring. However, for most ion species with γ ≠ γt, the time resolutions are inevitably deteriorated depending on how far their γ values differ from γt [12].

To make IMS broadband, great efforts have been made [13,14], and an additional velocity (v) measurement at the straight section of the ring was also proposed [12,15]. The velocity measurement was finally realized at the CSRe [16,17], enabling determination of both orbit length, C = vT, and magnetic rigidity, Bρ = m/qγv, for reference ions with well-known masses. Consequently, the universal calibration function Bρ(C) is constructed, enabling Bρ determination for non-reference ions using their measured C values—thereby realizing Bρ-defined IMS (or Bρ-IMS) [18]. Using this technique, mass measurements with remarkable precision down to 5 keV were achieved [19], and numerous new mass values were determined for the first time [20–22]. However, to obtain an accurate Bρ(C) function, one must eliminate the effect of magnetic field drifts during the experiment, which can be larger than ∼10⁻⁵. Thus, a complicated correction procedure was developed, requiring multiple reference ions to correct for magnetic field changes in each injection [19]. This requirement is unfavorable for mass measurements of exotic nuclei, as the number of reference ions in each injection can be quite low. Furthermore, the correction process may potentially introduce improper mass uncertainty assignments for both reference and non-reference ions (a similar example can be found in Ref. [23]).

To address these challenges, a new approach for Bρ-IMS is needed. Given the short storage time of ions in the ring (a few hundred microseconds) per injection, magnetic field drifts become negligible over this brief duration. Therefore, if the Bρ value of non-reference ions can be directly determined via a single reference ion within the same injection, the need for correcting magnetic field drifts using multiple reference ions would be eliminated.

According to the definition of γt [11], d(Bρ)/Bρ = γ²/γt² · dC/C, which connects the Bρ and C differences between two ions within the same injection, thereby enabling in principle the Bρ determination of a non-reference ion based on a single reference ion. In this paper, we propose a novel method for Bρ-IMS that utilizes well-characterized γt values [24] for Bρ and mass determination. This method demonstrates two key advantages: (1) it requires only a single reference ion per injection, and (2) it naturally reduces the effects of magnetic field drifts, thereby obviating the need for extra correction procedures. In Sect. II, we outline the principle of this method. In Sect. III, we exemplify its performance through an experiment [18,19] using ⁵⁸Ni¹⁹⁺ as the primary beam. In Sect. IV, the discussion is presented, followed by a summary and outlook in Sect. V.

II. Principle of the New Method

According to the fundamental equation Bρ = m/q · γv, the mass-to-charge ratio m/q of a stored ion can be expressed as m/q = Bρ · √(1 - v²/c²) / v, where v is the velocity of the ion and c is the speed of light in vacuum. Since v is measured directly by the double time-of-flight (TOF) detectors installed in the straight section of the storage ring [17], the challenge in determining the unknown mass lies in the Bρ determination.

In previous Bρ-IMS works [18,19], Bρ and C were assumed to follow a Bρ(C) curve characterized by an analytic function, which was used to determine the Bρ values of non-reference ions based on their measured C values. However, the Bρ(C) curve varies with time due to magnetic field drifts. To obtain an accurate Bρ(C) function, a complicated method was utilized to mitigate the effect of field drifts, as detailed in Ref. [19].

In this work, we propose a more straightforward approach to determine the Bρ value of non-reference ions in each injection. For ions circulating in the ring, according to Eq. (1), the relative changes in Bρ and C satisfy the following equation: d(Bρ)/Bρ = γ²/γt² · dC/C, where parameter γt serves as a bridge connecting the relative variations in Bρ and C. Although γt is often considered constant with respect to C, it actually varies with C, forming a γt(C) curve [25].

For simplicity, consider two ions simultaneously stored in the ring: one is a reference ion with known mass, and the other is a non-reference ion with unknown mass. Let Bρ₀ and C₀ represent the magnetic rigidity and orbit length of the reference ion, respectively, while Bρₓ and Cₓ denote those of the non-reference ion. Note that Bρ₀, C₀, and Cₓ can be determined by measuring T and v for both ions. According to Eq. (3), one has:

∫{Bρ₀}^{Bρₓ} d(Bρ)/Bρ = ∫ γ²/γt²(C) · dC/C.}^{Cₓ

By defining K = ∫_{C₀}^{Cₓ} γ²/γt²(C) · dC/C, the equation becomes ln(Bρₓ/Bρ₀) = K, and thus:

Bρₓ = Bρ₀ · eᴷ.

Using the γt(C) curve, the parameter K defined in Eq. (5) is obtained through numerical integration: K = ∑_{i=1}^n γ²(Ci)/γt²(Ci) · ΔCs/Ci, where Ci = C₀ + iΔCs and ΔCs = (Cₓ - C₀)/n, with n representing the number of intervals. By choosing a large n, or equivalently, a sufficiently small ΔCs (e.g., 0.3 mm), the γt(C) value within each interval can be regarded as constant during integration.

Through Eq. (6), Bρₓ of the non-reference ion is obtained via a single reference ion in the same injection, and then the mass value is directly determined via Eq. (2). Consequently, the effect of magnetic field drifts between injections is expected to be effectively eliminated.

III. The γt, Bρ and Mass Determination

Several methods have been developed to measure the γt values [24,26], and their results are in excellent agreement. In this work, we employ the method using energy loss to calculate the γt(C) values due to its simplicity. Details regarding this method can be found in Ref. [24].

[FIGURE:1] illustrates the scatter plot of γt values obtained from all ions measured in the experiment using ⁵⁸Ni¹⁹⁺ as the primary beam [18,19]. The unreasonable scattered points are primarily attributed to the low detection efficiency of the TOF detector for light ions [24]. To obtain more accurate averaged γt values, only ions with mass number A greater than 18 are adopted. The averaged γt values within approximately 3 mm intervals are presented as the red curve. The γt value at any C within the specified range can be determined via linear interpolation.

[FIGURE:2] shows the m/q peaks obtained from this work. Different colors represent series of nuclides with a constant isospin projection Tz = (N - Z)/2, as shown in the legend.

[FIGURE:3] compares the standard deviation σ(m/q) of m/q peaks (in units of keV/e) from three methods: this work, previous Bρ-IMS, and transformed from the original T peaks without any post-processing procedure like magnetic field correction. Here, the transformed m/q peaks are obtained via Eq. (2), where v = C/T, and Bρ and C are fixed as 128.86 m and 5.4758 Tm, respectively (see Ref. [19] for details). It can be observed that σm/q from this work is significantly lower than that transformed from the original T peaks but is comparable to those obtained from previous Bρ-IMS. This indicates that the impact of magnetic field drifts on mass determination has been effectively eliminated by this new method. We note that this is achieved without any additional magnetic field correction procedures. Nevertheless, σm/q obtained from this work is slightly (approximately 1 keV/e) larger than that from previous Bρ-IMS results. This may be attributed to variation of the γt(C) curve caused by magnetic field drifts during the experiment. Further discussion is provided in Sect. IV.

Assuming that each m/q value contributes equally, the final determined m/q and its uncertainty are calculated as follows:

⟨m/q⟩ = (1/N) ∑{j=1}^N (m/q)_j,
σ / √(N - 1),} = σ_{m/q

with N being the number of counts.

For each nuclide, the comparison of mass excess (ME) with literature values (e.g., the previous Bρ-IMS result [19]) is illustrated in [FIGURE:4], showing good agreement between them.

To further quantitatively evaluate the agreement, the normalized χₙ defined as:

χₙ = √[ (1/Nc) ∑{i=1}^{Nc} (ME_i^{exp} - ME_i^{lit})² / (σ²) ]}² + σ_{lit

is employed. Here, Nc is the total number of nuclides for comparison, ME_i^{exp} and ME_i^{lit} are the mass excesses determined in this work and from the literature, respectively, and σ_{exp} and σ_{lit} represent the corresponding mass uncertainties. The obtained χₙ values of 0.80 and 0.53 for reference and non-reference nuclides indicate that the mass results from the two methods are in good agreement. However, the mass uncertainties in this work are slightly larger than those from previous Bρ-IMS work, consistent with the slightly larger σm/q observed in this work, as shown in [FIGURE:3].

We note that the two parameters L and Δt_d (see Ref. [19] for details) used to determine the velocity of each ion were optimized to minimize the χ² value. The literature ME values used for this optimization are taken from Ref. [27]. The obtained optimal values of L = 18.046 m and Δt_d = -147.0 ps agree well with those (L = 18.046 m and Δt_d = -146.83 ps) from previous Bρ-IMS work [19].

IV. Discussion

A. Effects of magnetic field (or γt) drifts

According to the study presented in Ref. [25], the γt(C) curve is affected by magnetic field drifts. For example, it can be shifted horizontally, vertically, or rotated by varying the dipole, quadrupole, and sextupole magnetic fields, respectively. Given that the utilized γt(C) value in this method is an averaged value over the entire experiment [24,26], for each injection the γt(C) value may vary from this averaged value due to magnetic field drifts, introducing potential uncertainties in Bρ and mass determination.

To quantitatively evaluate the effect of γt variation, we first assume that γt is independent of C. Considering that ΔC = Cₓ - C₀ is much smaller than Cₓ or C₀, the parameter K can be approximated as:

K = ∫_{C₀}^{Cₓ} γ²/γt² · dC/C ≃ γ²/γt² · ΔC/C₀.

Since γt is close to one, the K value is on the same order of magnitude as ΔC/C₀, which is significantly less than one. Consequently, according to Eq. (6), Bρₓ can be estimated as:

Bρₓ ≃ Bρ₀ · (1 + K) ≃ Bρ₀ · (1 + γ²/γt² · ΔC/C₀).

Assuming that magnetic field drift induces a variation δγt in γt, the corresponding variation in the calculated Bρₓ is denoted as δ(Bρₓ). From Eq. (11), we obtain:

δ(Bρₓ)/Bρₓ ≃ -2γt · (γ²/γt²) · (ΔC/C₀) · δγt.

Combining Eq. (2) and Eq. (12), one yields:

δ(m/q)/(m/q) ≃ δ(Bρₓ)/Bρₓ ≃ -2γ²/γt³ · (ΔC/C₀) · δγt.

Equation (13) clearly indicates that the effect of γt variation on the final mass value is significantly reduced by the small factor ΔC/C₀, which is generally on the order of 10⁻⁴ in Bρ-IMS. In this experiment, the average ΔC/C ratio is approximately ≃ 5 × 10⁻⁴.

To further support this conclusion, we present a specific example from the ⁵⁸Ni experiment. The variation of the (dipole) magnetic fields over injection numbers is illustrated in FIGURE:5 (one injection every 25 seconds; see Fig. 7(a) and the accompanying text in Ref. [19] for details).

Firstly, to examine the effect of magnetic field drifts on the γt(C) curve, two injection groups marked in red and blue in FIGURE:5 are selected. The corresponding γt(C) curves are shown in FIGURE:5, demonstrating horizontal shifts between the two groups, which is consistent with the conclusion drawn from Ref. [25]. The largest relative deviation occurs at the left part of the curve and reaches approximately 10⁻³.

Secondly, to quantify the impact of such γt(C) variation, we examined a simplified scenario in which all γt(C) values were systematically decreased by 10⁻³, corresponding to a downward shift of the γt(C) curve ([FIGURE:1]) by this amount. The resulting σm/q values are presented as triangles in FIGURE:5. These values are significantly smaller than the original ones (squares) but are still approximately 1 keV/e larger than the normal values (circles) obtained using the unshifted γt(C) curve. Notably, this magnitude of increase matches the discrepancy observed between our normal results (this work) and previous Bρ-IMS results (see [FIGURE:3]). This suggests that variations in the γt(C) curve, caused by the (dipole) magnetic field drifts, may be responsible for the observed discrepancy in σm/q between the two methods.

Equation (13) indicates that a 10⁻³ shift in the γt(C) curve introduces a relative m/q uncertainty: δ(m/q)/(m/q) ≃ 2 × 1.362 × (5 × 10⁻⁴) × 10⁻³ ≃ 2 × 10⁻⁶. This corresponds to an expected additional uncertainty of ∼4 keV/e in m/q, leading to an approximate 1 keV/e increase in σm/q. This estimation is in agreement with the observed 1 keV/e increase in σm/q in FIGURE:5, thereby confirming the validity of Eq. (13).

Finally, to demonstrate the effect of the γt(C) curve with and without the artificial shift on the final mass determination, the differences in ME values resulting are presented in FIGURE:5. Most of these differences lie within a narrow range of ±5 keV (see the shaded area in FIGURE:5), supporting the robustness of this method.

B. The advantage of requiring only one reference ion in each injection

Nowadays, nuclides with well-known masses have been extended to quite exotic regions, characterized by short half-lives and very low production yields. When measuring the mass values of mass-unknown nuclides using the Bρ-IMS technique, the number of stored ions per injection can become remarkably low.

[FIGURE:6] presents an example of the number of stored ions per injection in a Bρ-IMS experiment using ³⁶Ar as the primary beam. In this experiment, the magnetic rigidity of beam lines was optimized to maximize transport efficiency for the extremely exotic ion ²²Si¹⁴⁺. Consequently, the most frequently observed number of stored ions per injection was reduced to approximately three. Under such conditions, the previous Bρ-IMS method, which requires as many reference ions as possible for magnetic field correction, encounters significant challenges. One potential solution is to discard injections containing fewer than, for example, three reference ions to ensure successful magnetic field correction. However, this approach leads to a significant loss of statistics (28%) and may introduce biases in mass uncertainty assignments for both reference and non-reference ions. Alternatively, one could use the Bρ-C curve without magnetic field correction, but this would allow magnetic field fluctuations between injections to directly affect mass measurements at the 10⁻⁵ level, significantly degrading mass precisions.

In such challenging scenarios, the method proposed in this paper effectively overcomes all these challenges. It requires only one reference ion to determine unknown mass values and achieves high precision without magnetic field correction. Using this method, the re-determined ME value of ²³Si, which is 23365(16) keV [28], is fully confirmed by the LEBIT Penning trap result of 23362.9(5.8) keV [29], demonstrating the efficiency and reliability of this important improvement for Bρ-IMS.

V. Summary and Outlook

In this work, we propose a novel method relying on the γt(C) curve for Bρ-IMS to determine nuclear mass values. This method significantly reduces the need for correcting the effects of magnetic field drifts and requires at least only one reference ion with known mass value for the mass determination of ions of interest. Remarkably, the achieved mass precision, without any correction procedure, is still comparable to that of previous Bρ-IMS methods. Consequently, it not only simplifies the data analysis procedure for Bρ-IMS but is also suitable for future IMS experiments involving very exotic nuclei with extremely low yields.

Nonetheless, further improvements of this method are possible. First, while this method significantly reduces the influence of variations in the γt(C) curve (or magnetic field), residual effects cannot be entirely neglected, especially as the mass precision of Bρ-IMS is expected to continue improving. From this perspective, a stable magnetic field environment remains essential. However, given that absolutely stable magnetic fields are technically unachievable, and considering that drifts in dipole magnetic field induce only a horizontal shift in the γt(C) curve, a flatter γt(C) curve would further minimize the impact of dipole magnetic field drifts on final mass determinations and is thus highly desirable. Second, current mass determination in this method relies on averaging all obtained m/q values under the assumption of equal contribution. In reality, each individual obtained m/q value has different uncertainty, and this simple assumption may introduce deviations, particularly when statistics are limited. Future refinements should incorporate uncertainty quantification for individual m/q values of each nuclide to enable a weighted mean value and uncertainty.

VI. References

[1] X. L. Tu, H. S. Xu, M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, Y. A. Litvinov, Y. Sun, H. Schatz, X. H. Zhou, Y. J. Yuan, J. W. Xia, G. Audi, K. Blaum, C. M. Du, P. Geng, Z. G. Hu, W. X. Huang, S. L. Jin, L. X. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Ma, R. S. Mao, B. Mei, P. Shuai, Z. Y. Sun, H. Suzuki, S. W. Tang, J. S. Wang, S. T. Wang, G. Q. Xiao, X. Xu, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Yamaguchi, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, R. P. Ye, Y. D. Zang, H. W. Zhao, T. C. Zhao, X. Y. Zhang, W. L. Zhan, Direct mass measurements of short-lived A = 2Z−1 nuclides ⁶³Ge, ⁶⁵As, ⁶⁷Se, and ⁷¹Kr and their impact on nucleosynthesis in the rp process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 112501. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.112501. doi:.

[2] Y. H. Zhang, H. S. Xu, Y. A. Litvinov, X. L. Tu, X. L. Yan, S. Typel, K. Blaum, M. Wang, X. H. Zhou, Y. Sun, B. A. Brown, Y. J. Yuan, J. W. Xia, J. C. Yang, G. Audi, X. C. Chen, G. B. Jia, Z. G. Hu, X. W. Ma, R. S. Mao, B. Mei, P. Shuai, Z. Y. Sun, S. T. Wang, G. Q. Xiao, X. Xu, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. D. Zang, H. W. Zhao, T. C. Zhao, W. Zhang, W. L. Zhan, Mass measurements of the neutron-deficient ⁴¹Ti, ⁴⁵Cr, ⁴⁹Fe, and ⁵³Ni nuclides: First test of the isobaric multiplet mass equation in f p-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 102501. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.102501. doi:.

[3] X. Xu, P. Zhang, P. Shuai, R. J. Chen, X. L. Yan, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. A. Litvinov, H. S. Xu, T. Bao, X. C. Chen, H. Chen, C. Y. Fu, S. Kubono, Y. H. Lam, D. W. Liu, R. S. Mao, X. W. Ma, M. Z. Sun, X. L. Tu, Y. M. Xing, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, X. Zhou, X. H. Zhou, W. L. Zhan, S. Litvinov, K. Blaum, G. Audi, T. Uesaka, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Yamaguchi, A. Ozawa, B. H. Sun, Y. Sun, A. C. Dai, F. R. Xu, Identification of the lowest T = 2, Jπ = 0⁺ isobaric analog state in ⁵²Co and its impact on the understanding of β-decay properties of ⁵²Ni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 182503. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.182503. doi:.

[4] R. Knobel, M. Diwisch, F. Bosch, D. Boutin, L. Chen, C. Dimopoulou, A. Dolinskii, B. Franczak, B. Franzke, H. Geissel, M. Hausmann, C. Kozhuharov, J. Kurcewicz, S. A. Litvinov, G. Martinez-Pinedo, M. Matos, M. Mazzocco, G. Münzenberg, S. Nakajima, C. Nociforo, F. Nolden, T. Ohtsubo, A. Ozawa, Z. Patyk, W. R. Plass, C. Scheidenberger, J. Stadlmann, M. Steck, B. Sun, T. Suzuki, P. M. Walker, H. Weick, M. R. Wu, M. Winkler, T. Yamaguchi, First direct mass measurements of stored neutron-rich ¹²⁹,¹³⁰,¹³¹Cd isotopes with FRS-ESR, Physics Letters B 754 (2016) 288–293. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269316000563. doi:.

[5] Y. H. Zhang, P. Zhang, X. H. Zhou, M. Wang, Y. A. Litvinov, H. S. Xu, X. Xu, P. Shuai, Y. H. Lam, R. J. Chen, X. L. Yan, T. Bao, X. C. Chen, H. Chen, C. Y. Fu, J. J. He, S. Kubono, D. W. Liu, R. S. Mao, X. W. Ma, M. Z. Sun, X. L. Tu, Y. M. Xing, Q. Zeng, X. Zhou, W. L. Zhan, S. Litvinov, K. Blaum, G. Audi, T. Uesaka, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Yamaguchi, A. Ozawa, B. H. Sun, Y. Sun, F. R. Xu, Isochronous mass measurements of Tz = −1 f p-shell nuclei from projectile fragmentation of ⁵⁸Ni, Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014319. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014319. doi:.

[6] Y. M. Xing, K. A. Li, Y. H. Zhang, X. H. Zhou, M. Wang, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, S. Wanajo, S. Kubono, G. Martínez-Pinedo, A. Sieverding, R. J. Chen, P. Shuai, C. Y. Fu, X. L. Yan, W. J. Huang, X. Xu, X. D. Tang, H. S. Xu, T. Bao, X. C. Chen, B. S. Gao, J. J. He, Y. H. Lam, H. F. Li, J. H. Liu, X. W. Ma, R. S. Mao, M. Si, M. Z. Sun, X. L. Tu, Q. Wang, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, P. Zhang, X. Zhou, W. L. Zhan, S. Litvinov, G. Audi, T. Uesaka, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Yamaguchi, A. Ozawa, C. Fröhlich, T. Rauscher, F. K. Thielemann, B. H. Sun, Y. Sun, A. C. Dai, F. R. Xu, Mass measurements of neutron-deficient Y, Zr, and Nb isotopes and their impact on rp and νp nucleosynthesis processes, Physics Letters B 781 (2018) 358–363. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269318302934. doi:.

[7] Y. M. Xing, C. X. Yuan, M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, X. H. Zhou, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, H. S. Xu, T. Bao, R. J. Chen, C. Y. Fu, B. S. Gao, W. W. Ge, J. J. He, W. J. Huang, T. Liao, J. G. Li, H. F. Li, S. Litvinov, S. Naimi, P. Shuai, M. Z. Sun, Q. Wang, X. Xu, F. R. Xu, T. Yamaguchi, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, M. Zhang, X. Zhou, Isochronous mass measurements of neutron-deficient nuclei from ¹¹²Sn projectile fragmentation, Physical Review C 107 (2023) 014304. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014304. doi:.

[8] D. Lunney, New mass measurements with trapped (radioactive) ions and related fundamental physics, Hyperfine Interactions 240 (2019) 48. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-019-1581-z. doi:.

[9] M. Steck, Y. A. Litvinov, Heavy-ion storage rings and their use in precision experiments with highly charged ions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 115 (2020) 103811. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641020300582. doi:.

[10] T. Yamaguchi, H. Koura, Y. Litvinov, M. Wang, Masses of exotic nuclei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 120 (2021) 103882. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641021000363. doi:.

[11] M. Hausmann, F. Attallah, K. Beckert, F. Bosch, A. Dolinskii, H. Eickhoff, M. Falch, B. Franczak, B. Franzke, H. Geissel, T. Kerscher, O. Klepper, H.-J. Kluge, C. Kozhuharov, K. Löbner, G. Münzenberg, F. Nolden, Y. Novikov, T. Radon, H. Schatz, C. Scheidenberger, J. Stadlmann, M. Steck, T. Winkler, H. Wollnik, First isochronous mass spectrometry at the experimental storage ring ESR, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 446 (2000) 569–580. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900299011924. doi:.

[12] H. Geissel, R. Knöbel, Y. A. Litvinov, B. Sun, K. Beckert, P. Beller, F. Bosch, D. Boutin, C. Brandau, L. Chen, B. Fabian, M. Hausmann, C. Kozhuharov, J. Kurcewicz, S. A. Litvinov, M. Mazzocco, F. Montes, G. Münzenberg, A. Musumarra, C. Nociforo, F. Nolden, W. R. Plaß, C. Scheidenberger, M. Steck, H. Weick, M. Winkler, A new experimental approach for isochronous mass measurements of short-lived exotic nuclei with the FRS-ESR facility, Hyperfine Interactions 173 (2006) 49–54. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-007-9541-4. doi:.

[13] H.-Y. Deng, Y.-M. Xing, X. Zhou, Y.-H. Zhang, X.-L. Yan, J.-Y. Shi, T. Liao, M. Wang, Improved isochronous mass spectrometry with tune measurement, Nuclear Science and Techniques 35 (2024) 203. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01580-5. doi:.

[14] J.-H. Liu, Z. Ge, Q. Wang, G. Wang, L.-N. Sheng, W.-W. Ge, X. Xu, P. Shuai, Q. Zeng, B. Wu, Electrostatic-lenses position-sensitive TOF MCP detector for beam diagnostics and new scheme for mass measurements at HIAF, Nuclear Science and Techniques 30 (2019) 152. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0676-1. doi:.

[15] H. Geissel, Y. A. Litvinov, Precision experiments with relativistic exotic nuclei at GSI, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 31 (2005) S1779–S1783. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/10/072. doi:.

[16] Y. M. Xing, M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, P. Shuai, X. Xu, R. J. Chen, X. L. Yan, X. L. Tu, W. Zhang, C. Y. Fu, H. S. Xu, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, X. C. Chen, Z. Ge, B. S. Gao, W. J. Huang, S. A. Litvinov, D. W. Liu, X. W. Ma, R. S. Mao, G. Q. Xiao, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, X. H. Zhou, First isochronous mass measurements with two time-of-flight detectors at CSRe, Physica Scripta T166 (2015) 014010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2015/t166/014010. doi:.

[17] X. Zhou, M. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, Y. J. Yuan, X. L. Yan, X. H. Zhou, H. S. Xu, X. C. Chen, Y. M. Xing, R. J. Chen, X. Xu, P. Shuai, C. Y. Fu, Q. Zeng, M. Z. Sun, H. F. Li, Q. Wang, T. Bao, M. Si, H. Y. Deng, M. Z. Liu, T. Liao, J. Y. Shi, Y. N. Song, J. C. Yang, W. W. Ge, Y. A. Litvinov, S. A. Litvinov, R. S. Sidhu, T. Yamaguchi, S. Omika, K. Wakayama, S. Suzuki, T. Moriguchi, In-ring velocity measurement for isochronous mass spectrometry, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24 (2021) 042802. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.042802. doi:.

[18] M. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Zhou, Y. H. Zhang, Y. A. Litvinov, H. S. Xu, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, H. F. Li, T. Liao, S. A. Litvinov, P. Shuai, J. Y. Shi, M. Si, R. S. Sidhu, Y. N. Song, M. Z. Sun, S. Suzuki, Q. Wang, Y. M. Xing, X. Xu, T. Yamaguchi, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, X. H. Zhou, Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry: An approach for high-precision mass measurements of short-lived nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) L051301. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L051301. doi:.

[19] M. Zhang, X. Zhou, M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, Y. A. Litvinov, H. S. Xu, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, H. F. Li, T. Liao, S. A. Litvinov, P. Shuai, J. Y. Shi, R. S. Sidhu, Y. N. Song, M. Z. Sun, S. Suzuki, Q. Wang, Y. M. Xing, X. Xu, T. Yamaguchi, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, X. H. Zhou, Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry and mass measurements of ⁵⁸Ni fragments, The European Physical Journal A 59 (2023) 27. URL: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00928-6. doi:.

[20] M. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, X. Zhou, X. H. Zhou, H. S. Xu, M. L. Liu, J. G. Li, Y. F. Niu, W. J. Huang, Q. Yuan, S. Zhang, F. R. Xu, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, Z. Meisel, R. F. Casten, R. B. Cakirli, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, H. F. Li, T. Liao, S. A. Litvinov, P. Shuai, J. Y. Shi, Y. N. Song, M. Z. Sun, Q. Wang, Y. M. Xing, X. Xu, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, M. Zhang, Mass measurement of upper f p-shell N = Z − 2 and N = Z − 1 nuclei and the importance of three-nucleon force along the N = Z line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 192501. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.192501. doi:.

[21] Y. Yu, Y. M. Xing, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, X. H. Zhou, J. G. Li, H. H. Li, Q. Yuan, Y. F. Niu, Y. N. Huang, J. Geng, J. Y. Guo, J. W. Chen, J. C. Pei, F. R. Xu, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, G. de Angelis, I. Tanihata, T. Yamaguchi, X. Zhou, H. S. Xu, Z. Y. Chen, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, W. J. Huang, H. Y. Jiao, Y. F. Luo, H. F. Li, T. Liao, J. Y. Shi, M. Si, M. Z. Sun, P. Shuai, X. L. Tu, Q. Wang, X. Xu, X. L. Yan, Y. J. Yuan, M. Zhang, Nuclear structure of dripline nuclei elucidated through precision mass measurements of ²³Si, ²⁶P, ²⁷,²⁸S, and ³¹Ar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 222501. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.222501. doi:.

[22] X. Zhou, M. Wang, Y.-H. Zhang, X.-H. Zhou, X.-L. Yan, Y.-M. Xing, Bρ-defined isochronous mass spectrometry at the storage ring CSRe, Nuclear Science and Techniques 35 (2024) 213. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01587-y. doi:.

[23] Y. M. Xing, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. A. Litvinov, R. J. Chen, X. C. Chen, C. Y. Fu, H. F. Li, P. Shuai, M. Si, M. Z. Sun, X. L. Tu, Q. Wang, H. S. Xu, X. Xu, X. L. Yan, J. C. Yang, Y. J. Yuan, Q. Zeng, P. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Zhou, X. H. Zhou, Particle identification and revolution time corrections for the isochronous mass spectrometry in storage rings, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 941 (2019) 162331. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900219309179. doi:.

[24] M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, X. Zhou, Y. Yuan, X. Yan, Y. Xing, C. Fu, R. Chen, X. Xu, P. Shuai, Q. Zeng, M. Sun, H. Li, M. Si, Q. Wang, T. Bao, H. Deng, M. Liu, T. Liao, J. Shi, Y. Song, H. Jiao, X. Zhou, H. Xu, J. Yang, W. Ge, Y. Litvinov, S. Litvinov, T. Yamaguchi, S. Suzuki, Precision measurement of the transition energy γt versus magnetic rigidity for storage-ring isochronous mass spectrometry, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1027 (2022) 166329. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900222000183. doi:.

[25] W. W. Ge, Y. J. Yuan, J. C. Yang, R. J. Chen, X. L. Yan, H. Du, Z. S. Li, J. Yang, D. Y. Yin, L. J. Mao, X. N. Li, W. H. Zheng, G. D. Shen, B. Wu, S. Ruan, G. Wang, H. Zhao, M. Wang, M. Z. Sun, Y. M. Xing, P. Zhang, C. Y. Fu, P. Shuai, X. Xu, Y. H. Zhang, T. Bao, X. C. Chen, W. J. Huang, H. F. Li, J. H. Liu, Y. A. Litvinov, S. Litvinov, Q. Zeng, X. Zhou, Experimental investigation of the transition energy γt in the isochronous mode of the HIRFL-CSRe, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 908 (2018) 388–393. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900218310179. doi:.

[26] R. J. Chen, X. L. Yan, W. W. Ge, Y. J. Yuan, M. Wang, M. Z. Sun, Y. M. Xing, P. Zhang, C. Y. Fu, P. Shuai, X. Xu, Y. H. Zhang, T. Bao, X. C. Chen, X. J. Hu, W. J. Huang, H. F. Li, J. H. Liu, Y. A. Livinov, S. A. Livinov, L. J. Mao, B. Wu, H. S. Xu, J. C. Yang, D. Y. Yin, Q. Zeng, X. H. Zhang, W. H. Zheng, X. H. Zhou, X. Zhou, A method to measure the transition energy γt of the isochronously tuned storage ring, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 898 (2018) 111–116. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900218305734. doi:.

[27] M. Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references, Chinese Physics C 45 (2021) 030003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf. doi:.

[28] Y. M. Xing, Y. F. Luo, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, X. H. Zhou, J. G. Li, K. H. Li, Q. Yuan, Y. F. Niu, J. Y. Guo, J. C. Pei, F. R. Xu, G. de Angelis, Y. A. Litvinov, K. Blaum, I. Tanihata, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Yu, X. Zhou, H. S. Xu, Z. Y. Chen, R. J. Chen, H. Y. Deng, C. Y. Fu, W. W. Ge, W. J. Huang, H. Y. Jiao, H. F. Li, T. Liao, J. Y. Shi, M. Si, M. Z. Sun, P. Shuai, X. L. Tu, Q. Wang, X. Xu, X. L. Yan, Y. J. Yuan, M. Zhang, Z = 14 magicity revealed by the mass of the proton dripline nucleus ²²Si, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01380. arXiv:2503.01380.

[29] F. M. Maier, G. Bollen, B. A. Brown, S. E. Campbell, X. Chen, H. Erington, N. D. Gamage, C. M. Ireland, R. Ringle, S. Schwarz, C. S. Sumithrarachchi, A. C. C. Villari, Exploring isospin symmetry breaking in exotic nuclei: High-precision mass measurement of ²³Si and shell-model calculations of T = 5/2 isotopes, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03034. arXiv:2503.03034.