Preamble

The Development, Trend, and Implication of Artificial Intelligence in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

Lou Feng¹, Dong Wanlu²
(¹Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Library, Beijing 100732, China;
²Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China)

Abstract:
[Purpose/Significance] The current digital wave is sweeping across the globe, and artificial intelligence, as the most disruptive and transformative force in the technological domain, is integrating into human society at an unprecedented pace. Philosophy and social sciences are inevitably entering a new era of deep integration with artificial intelligence. Looking ahead, the application trend of AI in philosophy and social sciences research will become increasingly significant. [Method/Process] Based on a comprehensive review of the development trajectory, theoretical framework, and implementation mechanisms of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, this paper selects the "Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory" of the Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as a typical case to analyze the application trends and development prospects of AI in this field, and proposes targeted policy recommendations. [Result/Conclusion] This study proposes integration prospects and application methods for AI in philosophy and social sciences research, aiming to provide practical reference and inspiration for promoting the deep integration of AI and philosophy and social sciences.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Philosophy and social sciences; Interdisciplinary integration; Economic big data

As the digital wave sweeps the globe, artificial intelligence has emerged as one of the most transformative forces in technology, penetrating every corner of human society at an unprecedented speed. Philosophy and social sciences, as crucial disciplines exploring human existence, social development, and civilizational evolution, have inevitably ushered in an era of deep integration with AI. From early exploratory applications of AI in philosophy and social sciences research to today's paradigm revolution enabled by big data, machine learning, and generative AI, this process has not only witnessed the collision and fusion of technology and humanities but also foreshadows a new developmental stage for philosophy and social sciences research. Looking forward, the application trends of AI in philosophy and social sciences research will become more pronounced. Interdisciplinary integration will become mainstream, intelligent research tools will be widely adopted, and research ethics and norms will be further strengthened. This paper systematically reviews the development history, theoretical framework, and implementation mechanisms of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, using the "Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory" of the Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as a case study to analyze application trends and development prospects, and proposes corresponding policy recommendations to provide useful reference for promoting the deep integration of AI and philosophy and social sciences.

1. The Development History of Artificial Intelligence in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

The application of AI in philosophy and social sciences research can be traced back to the mid-20th century. With the initial development of computer technology, scholars began attempting to apply computer programs to social science research. For instance, early expert systems were used to simulate human expert decision-making processes, providing solutions to complex social problems [1]. However, due to technological limitations, early AI applications primarily focused on statistical data processing and simple model construction, having limited substantive impact on philosophy and social sciences research, though they laid the foundation for subsequent development [2].

Entering the 21st century, the rise of big data and machine learning technologies has brought new opportunities for AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. Big data technology enables researchers to acquire and process unprecedented volumes of data, while machine learning provides powerful analytical tools to extract valuable information and patterns. During this period, AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research gradually deepened, covering increasingly broad fields. For example, in political science, data mining techniques have been used to analyze voter behavior and election outcomes; in economics, machine learning algorithms have been employed to predict market trends and economic indicators [3].

In recent years, breakthroughs in deep learning and natural language processing have created new opportunities for AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. Deep learning enables computers to automatically learn complex patterns and features from large datasets, improving model accuracy and generalization capabilities. Natural language processing allows computers to understand and generate human language, providing powerful text analysis tools for social science research [4]. The emergence of generative AI, exemplified by ChatGPT, has further advanced AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. Generative AI can not only produce high-quality text, images, and video content but also simulate human thinking and behavior, offering entirely new perspectives and tools for philosophy and social sciences research. Through generative AI, researchers can more efficiently collect and process data, build more complex models, and even simulate human social behavior and decision-making processes [5-7].

2.1.1 A Philosophical Examination of AI Technology Application in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

From an epistemological perspective, AI has brought innovation and expansion to cognitive approaches in philosophy and social sciences research. With its powerful data processing capabilities and algorithmic models, AI serves as a powerful extension of human cognition. However, we must清醒地recognize the limitations of AI cognition. Its cognitive process is essentially data-driven and algorithm-based, and issues such as data bias and algorithmic prejudice may lead to distorted research conclusions. Therefore, philosophy and social sciences researchers must maintain critical thinking when using AI tools, combining AI-generated results with rich human experience and robust theoretical frameworks to avoid falling into the trap of "technological determinism" and ensure scientific rigor and reliability.

From an axiological perspective, the application of AI in philosophy and social sciences research highlights the complex relationship between technological ethics and human subjectivity. On one hand, AI brings efficiency gains and innovation opportunities to research, but it also raises a series of ethical controversies, such as data privacy and algorithmic transparency. This requires researchers to strictly follow ethical guidelines, ensure legal and compliant data sources, and design fair and transparent algorithms, integrating technological ethics throughout the entire research process. On the other hand, the widespread application of AI may challenge human subjectivity. Over-reliance on AI-generated content may cause researchers to lose originality and deep thinking abilities, becoming passive recipients of technology. The core of philosophy and social sciences research lies in profound insights and value judgments on human society, culture, and ethics. We must adhere to human-centered principles, viewing AI as an auxiliary tool rather than a "panacea" that replaces human wisdom.

From an ontological dimension, the integration of AI and philosophy and social sciences research heralds the arrival of a new human-machine symbiosis form and will have far-reaching impacts on social structures. AI is no longer merely a tool but has become an important participant in the research process. This human-machine collaborative relationship requires us to rethink the essential relationship between "human" and "technology," exploring their complementarity and synergy in knowledge production and value creation. Meanwhile, the popularization of AI may reshape the social foundation of philosophy and social sciences research. Data-driven research paradigms may change traditional academic evaluation systems, interdisciplinary collaboration will become more frequent, and new research fields and directions will emerge. However, issues such as technological monopoly and the digital divide may also follow, exacerbating social inequality. Therefore, researchers must pay close attention to the potential impacts of technology on social structures, actively promote the construction of an inclusive and fair human-machine symbiosis environment, ensure that technological development benefits all members of society, and promote harmony and progress in human society.

2.1.2 The Evolution of Research Paradigms in Philosophy and Social Sciences

The deep integration of AI and philosophy and social sciences research has greatly expanded research boundaries and brought new perspectives. At the data level, AI, with its powerful data processing capabilities, integrates multi-channel, multi-format massive data such as social media, government, and enterprise data, and can automatically clean and preprocess data to improve data quality, laying a solid foundation for research. Simultaneously, it builds interdisciplinary technology platforms to achieve multi-modal data fusion, such as combining text and images to study cultural phenomena, and can construct simulation models for prediction, such as simulating economic system operations to assist policy formulation. Additionally, AI enables diversified research application scenarios, aiding urban management and public safety governance in social governance, and promoting digital restoration and display of cultural relics in cultural inheritance and innovation, providing rich practical soil for philosophy and social sciences research [8-9].

AI has prompted profound paradigm shifts in philosophy and social sciences research. Research perspectives have shifted from single disciplines to multidisciplinary integration, requiring the integration of knowledge from philosophy, sociology, and other disciplines, such as in studying AI ethics issues. It also requires a global perspective, integrating global data to study global issues such as the impact of climate change on socio-economics. Research subjects have shifted from researcher-dominated to human-machine collaboration, with AI systems participating in the research process and jointly completing tasks with researchers, whose roles have transformed into designers, managers, and interpreters of AI systems. Research goals have also moved from descriptive studies to predictive and interventional studies, using AI for predictive analysis, such as forecasting socio-economic development trends, and proposing policy recommendations based on predictive results to guide social development [10-11].

AI has brought many innovative methods to philosophy and social sciences research. In terms of data-driven approaches, it deepens quantitative analysis, such as using algorithms to analyze financial market data to predict stock trends, and can also quantify qualitative data, such as using natural language processing technology to analyze news reports for public opinion quantification research. In experimental methods, AI helps build virtual experimental environments to simulate social phenomena, such as studying information dissemination patterns, and can design scientific experimental schemes based on big data, such as screening medical data samples for drug efficacy research. Visualization research methods have also been innovated, as AI can present complex data and models through intuitive charts and images, such as displaying regional development conditions in geographic information systems or showing variable relationships through visual economic models, helping researchers better understand and interpret research content [12-13].

2.2 Implementation Mechanisms

The theoretical system of philosophy and social sciences is undergoing transformative opportunities empowered by AI. On one hand, AI promotes the fusion and innovation of theories across disciplines. For example, sociology expands social network analysis theory with big data and machine learning, while economics enriches traditional theories using reinforcement learning to simulate complex market environments. On the other hand, interdisciplinary theoretical construction becomes necessary. For instance, studying ethical decision-making in autonomous vehicles requires integrating philosophical ethics, computer algorithm ethics, and sociological public acceptance theories. Furthermore, AI provides new means for theoretical verification and correction. Through big data simulation and real-time monitoring, theoretical deviations can be promptly identified and adjusted, enhancing theoretical explanatory power and predictive accuracy [14].

Technology and data are the core supports for AI application in philosophy and social sciences research. In terms of technology application, natural language processing assists in text processing and analysis, machine learning provides support for prediction and decision-making, and knowledge graphs enable structured knowledge association. In data acquisition, multi-source data is automatically obtained through AI technology, forming high-quality datasets after cleaning, preprocessing, and fusion, while data sharing platforms promote resource openness [6]. However, technology application and data usage also face security challenges, requiring measures such as data privacy protection, algorithm security assessment, and system security protection to ensure the safety and reliability of research data and systems.

AI has broad application scenarios in philosophy and social sciences research. In the policy domain, it can be used for policy simulation, prediction, and real-time effect monitoring, providing scientific basis for policy formulation and adjustment. In social governance and public services, it can achieve social risk early warning and public service optimization, such as epidemic prevention and control early warning and traffic congestion alleviation. In academic research and education, it can promote research method innovation and educational teaching reform, such as discovering new perspectives through historical document mining and providing personalized learning solutions through intelligent teaching systems, fully demonstrating AI's practical value in the field of philosophy and social sciences [15].

3.1 Strengthening Interdisciplinary Integration Trends

AI is becoming a catalyst for deep integration between philosophy and social sciences and other disciplines, breaking traditional disciplinary barriers and spawning emerging interdisciplinary fields such as "computational social science" and "complex systems" [16]. When studying complex social phenomena, such as climate change-induced migration waves, environmental science, economics, political science, and AI technology collaborate to deeply analyze the internal relationships between population flow and social structural changes through multi-modal data modeling. Simultaneously, AI has revolutionized interdisciplinary research paradigms. Traditional methods relying on literature review and qualitative analysis are being replaced by real-time dynamic analysis based on machine learning and natural language processing [6]. For example, in social media public opinion research, AI tools can capture multilingual texts and combine psychological models to gain insights into the relationship between public sentiment and social events. Furthermore, AI has expanded global academic cooperation networks, promoting international collaboration from single-discipline dominance to multi-disciplinary coordination. For instance, the EU's "Human Brain Project" unites experts from multiple fields to explore the nature of consciousness and AI ethics issues, providing a new paradigm for interdisciplinary collaboration in philosophy and social sciences research.

3.2 Popularization of Intelligent Research Tools

Intelligent research tools are becoming increasingly popular in philosophy and social sciences research, greatly enhancing research efficiency and quality. Generative AI-supported literature review methods can automatically capture, classify, and annotate massive amounts of literature and generate visual knowledge graphs. In historical research, this can quickly compare ancient texts to reveal historical evolution patterns. The interaction capabilities of large language models with multi-modal data enable research to go beyond text and integrate images, audio, and other data. In cultural studies, AI can analyze visual symbols and dialogue texts in film and television works to uncover the ideological connotations of cultural products [17]. Moreover, AI technology runs through the entire research process, from data collection and cleaning to model construction and result verification, all achieving automated processing. In economics research, agent-driven simulation systems can adjust parameters in real-time to predict policy effects, providing scientific basis for decision-making.

3.3 Strengthening Research Ethics and Norms

With the widespread application of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, research ethics and norms face new challenges and urgently need to be strengthened and improved. The academic ethics framework needs to be reconstructed to address integrity issues arising from AI-generated content entering the research process. Currently, many national academic institutions require disclosure of AI participation in research outcomes and have developed detection tools to verify data authenticity. Some journals have also introduced "AI participation disclosure systems" to regulate academic behavior. Ethics review mechanisms are also being continuously improved. In response to AI technology ethics risks, academia has established multi-stakeholder collaborative governance networks. For example, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and other institutions have jointly established ethics review committees to conduct traceability reviews of AI-generated results [18]. Additionally, the scientific research evaluation system needs adaptive innovation to accommodate the new AI-empowered research ecosystem. It is necessary to reconstruct "originality" evaluation standards, introduce a "human-AI collaborative contribution" model to quantify academic value, and incorporate AI tool usage records into the evaluation scope.

4. Development Prospects of AI in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research: A Case Study of the Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory

4.1 Development Prospects

AI is leading a profound transformation of research paradigms in philosophy and social sciences. Traditional research often relied on limited sample empirical induction, but now, with AI's powerful data processing capabilities, data-driven approaches have become the new research model. For example, in economics, while previous economic cycle studies were based on local surveys, it is now possible to collect massive global enterprise and financial market data and use machine learning to discover new patterns, laying the foundation for theoretical innovation. Simultaneously, research has moved from static analysis to dynamic simulation. For instance, in urban development studies, AI models can input multi-dimensional data such as population, land, and transportation to simulate urban evolution under different policies, helping to understand dynamic development mechanisms and optimize urban planning [11,19]. Moreover, research perspectives have expanded from single-disciplinary to interdisciplinary comprehensive viewpoints. Taking social equity issues as an example, integrating sociological and political science theories with computer science data analysis and economic cost-benefit analysis, AI integrates multi-disciplinary methods to provide more comprehensive solutions for complex social problems.

AI brings dual improvements in efficiency and quality to philosophy and social sciences research. In data collection and processing, automation can be achieved, such as using web crawlers to capture news and social media data, and then using natural language processing technology to clean, annotate, and analyze texts, greatly improving efficiency and quality. In model construction and verification, AI algorithms build more accurate models. For example, psychological research can use machine learning to construct psychological models based on large-scale data to accurately predict individual psychology and behavior, and can optimize models through cross-validation and other methods to enhance reliability. In knowledge mining and discovery, deep learning technology can uncover hidden knowledge from massive data. For instance, historical research can use it to mine potential relationships between events and figures in historical documents, discovering new perspectives and patterns, and revealing the dissemination paths and evolution patterns of cultural phenomena.

To adapt to AI application in philosophy and social sciences research, cultivating interdisciplinary talent is crucial. In terms of curriculum design and teaching content, universities and research institutions need to innovate. Philosophy and social sciences-related majors should add AI courses such as machine learning and data mining, while computer science majors should strengthen knowledge transfer in philosophy and social sciences, such as offering courses like "AI and Social Research" to equip students with interdisciplinary methods. In practical teaching and project cooperation, collaboration with enterprises and research institutions on projects allows students to participate in actual research, such as social public opinion analysis projects, applying theory, statistics, and AI technology to practice, while encouraging students to participate in interdisciplinary competitions to enhance innovation and teamwork skills. In faculty construction and academic exchange, universities should introduce interdisciplinary talent or encourage teachers to engage in interdisciplinary learning, strengthen academic exchanges, and hold events such as "AI and Philosophy and Social Sciences Frontier Forums" to promote intellectual collisions and knowledge sharing across disciplines.

4.2.1 Laboratory Construction: Leading a New Trend in Philosophy and Social Sciences

In the digital wave of the 21st century, philosophy and social sciences research is undergoing unprecedented profound transformation. Facing major national needs and complex, ever-changing social practices, the Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (hereinafter referred to as "IQTE"), driven by innovation, has devoted significant efforts to building the "Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory." This laboratory not only bears the important responsibility of promoting the integration of natural and social sciences but also provides solid data support for the study of Xi Jinping's economic thought, demonstrating the academic reputation and influence of a national think tank.

The laboratory leverages IQTE's characteristics of "interdisciplinary, strong methodology, and emphasis on ideas," combining the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' "Peak Climbing Strategy" advantageous discipline "Quantitative Economics" and emerging interdisciplinary field "Digital Economy," as well as IQTE's key disciplines "Technical Economics" and "Green and Low-Carbon Economics." It fully connects with various economic big data resources, applies modern quantitative economic methods and economic policy simulation advantages, and promotes the organic combination of AI and economic and social development. The laboratory is committed to building a high-level shared research platform, producing original academic achievements with significant influence and think tank results with decision-making reference value, building an innovative team gathering strategic and leading talents at the international level, becoming an important source and bridgehead for prospering Chinese academia, developing Chinese theory, and spreading Chinese thought, and creating a first-class laboratory based in IQTE, serving the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and radiating across the nation.

4.2.2 Sub-Laboratory Architecture: Applying Disciplinary Tools to Focus on Key Issues

In terms of organizational structure, the "Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory" personnel mainly include a management committee, academic committee, laboratory director, laboratory researchers, and administrative staff, implementing a director responsibility system under the leadership of the management committee. The laboratory has established five sub-laboratories: China Macroeconomic Monitoring, Forecasting and Policy Simulation; Global and National Economic Monitoring and Forecasting Analysis; China Regional Economic Monitoring Analysis and Policy Simulation; Economic Development Index Monitoring and Analysis; and Economic Big Data Sharing Platform. Each sub-laboratory fully absorbs talents with interdisciplinary backgrounds, focusing respectively on macroeconomic models, global and national economic operation monitoring and early warning, China's regional economic and social development and intelligent governance, thematic indexes of economic and social development, and text analysis big data. They comprehensively apply research methods such as intelligent simulation, multi-dimensional policy simulation, artificial intelligence, web scraping, text mining, machine learning, and network analysis, fully reflecting the characteristics of interdisciplinary research and helping to promote the application of computer science in philosophy and social sciences research.

Furthermore, the laboratory independently developed the "Social Science Intelligence" AI large model, which has three distinctive features and core competitive advantages. First, the deep integration of quantitative research and qualitative analysis. The "Social Science Intelligence" large model is positioned as a professional large model. On one hand, based on fully absorbing the computational principles of international mainstream large models, it integrates with more than 30 years of accumulated and developed platforms by IQTE, including China's economic, energy, environmental, and fiscal policy simulation analysis system platform, global trade policy simulation system platform, China's macroeconomic real-time monitoring and forecasting system platform, global multi-regional industrial chain and value chain analysis system platform, and journal paper analysis system platform. It applies AI large models to conduct in-depth qualitative analysis of the causes and mechanisms of the results calculated by the above models. On the other hand, when quantitative analysis questions are input into "Social Science Intelligence," it directly calls the above system platforms for predictive and simulation analysis. This deep integration of quantitative and qualitative analysis gives "Social Science Intelligence" outstanding quantitative analysis features and core competitiveness. Second, it has obvious resource advantages in the field of philosophy and social sciences. From a resource integration perspective, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has numerous excellent philosophy and social sciences journals and well-known domestic publishers, which are undoubtedly valuable academic assets. By integrating these electronic resources, including massive journal articles, research reports, and investigation reports, "Social Science Intelligence" can be provided with rich and high-quality model training materials and knowledge bases. This not only helps enhance the academic professionalism and generality of the large model but also ensures its quality reaches a first-class domestic level in the generative AI field. Third, it has obvious platform advantages. As a national-level research institution, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has strong comprehensive technical strength and R&D capabilities. This interdisciplinary comprehensive research capability gives it unique advantages in developing AI large models with social science characteristics. Additionally, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' national-level platform can attract high-end professional AI talents, providing strong intellectual support for developing high-performance, high-quality AI large models. Moreover, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has established close cooperative relationships with numerous domestic and foreign universities, enterprises, and research institutions. This extensive cooperation network enables it to share the latest research results and technical resources, accelerating the R&D process of AI large models.

The laboratory's research personnel include economists or chief experts, economic analysts, data scientists, technical engineers, and research assistants. Economists, chief experts, and economic analysts mainly come from IQTE, the Macroeconomic Situation Quarterly Analysis Group, relevant institutes of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, or externally hired experts and scholars. Data scientists and technical engineers are mainly externally hired personnel. Research assistants mainly come from IQTE doctoral students, postdoctoral researchers, and visiting scholars. While promoting scientific research innovation, the laboratory also attaches great importance to research education. Through activities such as academic lectures and seminars, the laboratory provides researchers with rich academic resources and practical opportunities. Additionally, during its construction, the laboratory has conducted exchange and learning activities with the Economic School of Xiamen University and the Digital Economy Laboratory and National Security Computing Laboratory of the University of International Business and Economics. In participating in laboratory projects, researchers can not only access the most cutting-edge academic research results and technical means but also exercise their research and innovation abilities in practice. This theoretical-practical integrated operation model not only enhances researchers' comprehensive qualities and competitiveness but also cultivates more outstanding talents for the field of philosophy and social sciences.

Looking ahead, the "Economic Big Data and Policy Evaluation Laboratory" will actively connect with various big data resources from government departments, industries, and enterprises, scientifically apply modern quantitative economics and AI analysis methods, give full play to IQTE's profound accumulation and outstanding advantages in economic models and policy evaluation, and strive to promote the organic combination of AI and economic and social development. Simultaneously, the laboratory will continue to focus on major national strategic needs and social hot issues, provide scientific basis and intellectual support for party and government decision-making, and contribute more wisdom and strength to China's economic and social development.

5.1 Strengthen Policy Guidance and Support to Build an Institutional Framework for AI and Philosophy and Social Sciences Integration

In the era of deep integration between AI and philosophy and social sciences, policy guidance and support are key forces driving innovation and development in this field. The government should play a leading role in formulating comprehensive and detailed special development plans that clarify the strategic positioning, development goals, and implementation paths of AI in philosophy and social sciences research. The plans should cover multiple stages including basic research, application development, and achievement transformation to ensure the orderly advancement of work at each stage. Simultaneously, special funds should be established to provide stable financial support for interdisciplinary research projects, academic exchange activities, and talent cultivation programs, reducing financial pressure on researchers and stimulating their innovation vitality.

Furthermore, the government should encourage enterprises and research institutions to increase investment in AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research through economic means such as tax incentives and fiscal subsidies. For example, tax reductions can be granted to enterprises engaged in related technology R&D and applications, and rewards can be given to teams achieving significant research results, thereby forming a positive incentive mechanism to promote rapid development in this field. Simultaneously, a sound policy evaluation and adjustment mechanism should be established to regularly assess policy implementation effects and timely adjust policy directions and support levels based on evaluation results to ensure policy effectiveness and relevance.

In the policy implementation process, attention must also be paid to policy synergy and systematicity. The integration development of AI and philosophy and social sciences involves multiple departments and fields, requiring strengthened communication and collaboration among government departments to form policy synergy. For example, science and technology departments can be responsible for technology R&D and achievement transformation, education departments for talent cultivation and discipline construction, and cultural departments for ethical norms and cultural inheritance. Through inter-departmental coordination, the healthy development of AI in philosophy and social sciences research can be jointly promoted.

5.2 Establish Interdisciplinary Cooperation Mechanisms to Promote Deep Integration of AI and Philosophy and Social Sciences

Interdisciplinary cooperation is an important pathway for breakthroughs in AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. To achieve this goal, effective interdisciplinary cooperation mechanisms need to be established to promote deep integration and exchange among different disciplines.

First, interdisciplinary cooperation platforms should be built to provide venues for researchers to communicate and collaborate. Platforms can include online forums, offline seminars, cooperative laboratories, and other forms, encouraging researchers to share research results, exchange research insights, and explore cooperation opportunities. Through platform construction, disciplinary barriers can be broken, knowledge circulation and sharing can be promoted, and strong support can be provided for interdisciplinary research.

Second, forming interdisciplinary research teams is the core of interdisciplinary cooperation. Teams should include experts from multiple disciplines such as AI, philosophy, sociology, and economics to jointly carry out AI application projects in philosophy and social sciences research. Team members should establish close cooperative relationships, learn from and support each other, and jointly overcome research challenges. Through interdisciplinary team formation, complementary advantages among different disciplines can be achieved, improving research comprehensiveness and innovation.

Furthermore, cooperation among universities, research institutions, and enterprises should be encouraged. Universities and research institutions have rich scientific research resources and talent advantages, while enterprises have keen market insights and strong application development capabilities. Through industry-university-research cooperation, scientific research results from universities and research institutions can be transformed into practical applications, promoting the industrialization process of AI in philosophy and social sciences research. Simultaneously, enterprises can also obtain the latest scientific research results and technical support through cooperation, enhancing their competitiveness.

In the process of interdisciplinary cooperation, attention must also be paid to the cultivation of a cooperative culture. A cooperative culture emphasizes trust, respect, and inclusiveness among team members, encouraging the collision and fusion of different viewpoints. Through the cultivation of a cooperative culture, an open, inclusive, and innovative cooperation atmosphere can be created, stimulating researchers' innovative enthusiasm and promoting the in-depth development of interdisciplinary cooperation.

5.3 Improve Ethics and Legal Norms to Ensure Healthy Development of AI in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

With the widespread application of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, ethical and legal issues have become increasingly prominent. To ensure the healthy development of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, relevant ethics and legal norms must be improved.

In terms of ethical norms, ethics guidelines for AI in philosophy and social sciences research should be formulated. The guidelines should clarify researchers' behavioral norms and moral responsibilities, safeguarding the rights and dignity of research subjects. For example, in research involving human participants, the right to informed consent and privacy should be fully protected; when using AI for data analysis, data bias and discrimination should be avoided to ensure the fairness and objectivity of analysis results. Simultaneously, an ethics review mechanism should be established to conduct ethics reviews of research projects to ensure research activities comply with ethics guidelines.

In terms of legal norms, laws and regulations related to AI should be improved. Laws and regulations should clarify the legal status and responsibility attribution of AI in philosophy and social sciences research, providing legal protection for related research. For example, for research results generated by AI, intellectual property ownership should be clarified; for damages caused by AI technology, responsibility subjects and compensation mechanisms should be clearly defined. Simultaneously, publicity and popularization of laws and regulations should be strengthened to enhance researchers' legal awareness and compliance awareness.

Furthermore, supervision and evaluation mechanisms need to be strengthened. Regulatory departments should regularly inspect and evaluate AI application projects in philosophy and social sciences research to ensure they comply with ethics and legal norms. For violations, punishment should be administered according to law and publicly exposed as a deterrent. Through the construction of supervision and evaluation mechanisms, effective constraints and incentives can be formed to promote the healthy development of AI in philosophy and social sciences research.

5.4 Strengthen Talent Cultivation and Education to Provide Intellectual Support for AI Application in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

Talent cultivation and education are the foundation for promoting AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. To cultivate high-quality talents with interdisciplinary knowledge and skills, talent cultivation and education need to be strengthened.

In terms of curriculum design, the curriculum system of philosophy and social sciences-related majors should be optimized with increased AI-related content. For example, courses such as Introduction to AI, Data Mining and Analysis, and Machine Learning should be offered in majors like philosophy, sociology, and economics to enable students to master the basic principles and technical methods of AI. Simultaneously, students should be encouraged to take interdisciplinary courses to broaden their knowledge and horizons. Through curriculum optimization, students' interdisciplinary thinking and innovation abilities can be cultivated.

In terms of practical teaching, practical teaching components should be strengthened. Through internships, practical training, and project cooperation, students' practical abilities and problem-solving skills can be enhanced. For example, industry-university-research projects can be cooperatively carried out with enterprises, allowing students to apply learned AI technology to solve practical problems in philosophy and social sciences research. Through strengthened practical teaching, students' hands-on abilities and teamwork spirit can be cultivated.

Furthermore, international cooperation and exchange activities should be carried out. Through cooperation and exchange with world-class universities and research institutions, high-quality foreign educational resources can be introduced to improve China's talent cultivation level in AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research. For example, foreign experts can be invited to give lectures in China, cooperative research projects can be carried out, and students can be organized to participate in international academic conferences. Through international cooperation and exchange activities, students' international perspectives and academic exchange abilities can be broadened.

In the talent cultivation process, attention must also be paid to the cultivation of innovative spirit and entrepreneurial ability. Students should be encouraged to explore unknown fields and dare to propose new viewpoints and methods. Simultaneously, entrepreneurship guidance and support services should be provided to help students transform scientific research results into practical applications, achieving dual improvements in personal and social value.

5.5 Promote Data Sharing and Opening to Facilitate Data Resource Utilization for AI in Philosophy and Social Sciences Research

Data is an important foundation for AI in philosophy and social sciences research. To promote data resource utilization for AI in philosophy and social sciences research, data sharing and opening need to be promoted.

First, data sharing platforms should be established. Platforms should integrate various philosophy and social sciences research data resources, including survey data, statistical data, and literature data, providing convenient data access channels for researchers. Through data sharing platform construction, the phenomenon of data silos can be broken, promoting data circulation and sharing.

Second, data opening policies should be formulated. Policies should encourage research institutions and enterprises to open their research data resources, promoting data sharing and utilization. For example, a data opening reward mechanism can be established to reward institutions that open data resources and achieve good social benefits; simultaneously, data opening standards and technical specifications should be established to ensure the security and compliance of data opening. Through the formulation and implementation of data opening policies, the enthusiasm of data providers can be stimulated to promote the effective utilization of data resources.

Furthermore, data security protection work needs to be strengthened. While promoting data sharing and opening, the security and privacy of research data must be ensured. A sound data security management system and technical protection measures should be established to prevent data leakage and abuse. For example, encryption technology and access control technology can be used to protect data security; simultaneously, a data leakage emergency response mechanism should be established to timely respond to data leakage incidents. Through strengthened data security protection, the legitimate rights and interests of researchers and data security can be safeguarded.

In the process of promoting data sharing and opening, attention must also be paid to data quality and usability. A data quality evaluation mechanism should be established to evaluate and screen shared and opened data; simultaneously, data cleaning, annotation, and other services should be provided to improve data quality and usability. Through improved data quality and usability, effective data support can be provided for AI applications in philosophy and social sciences research.

5.6 Promote Deep Integration of Economic Quantitative Models and AI to Develop AI Research with Philosophy and Social Sciences Characteristics

The combination of economic quantitative models (such as multiple regression models, time series models, simultaneous equation models, computable general equilibrium models, panel regression, etc.) and AI can significantly enhance the accuracy, dynamic adaptability, and policy guidance value of social science research. However, their integration is not simple superposition but requires deep integration in methodology, algorithm optimization, and application scenarios. On one hand, hybrid models can be built combining traditional econometric methods and machine learning. Traditional economic quantitative models rely on strict assumptions (such as linear relationships, normal distribution), with the advantage of having solid economic theory, and their results and parameters can be explained and understood from economic theory; while machine learning excels at extracting non-linear patterns from complex data but often lacks economic connotation. Therefore, their combination can achieve complementary advantages. On the other hand, Agent-based modeling can be combined with reinforcement learning. Agent models study macro phenomena (such as economic growth, price fluctuations, market changes) by simulating the interactive behaviors of micro individuals (such as consumers, producers, intermediate traders), but traditional Agent model rule setting relies on artificial assumptions, lacks flexibility, and has a large gap with reality. Introducing reinforcement learning mechanisms allows AI agents to optimize strategies through trial-and-error learning, effectively enhancing the authenticity and reliability of simulated human behavior. Furthermore, explainable AI can be combined with philosophy and social sciences theory. Because philosophy and social sciences research emphasizes mechanism explanation, while deep learning is often regarded as a "black box." Through explainable AI technologies (such as SHAP values, attention mechanisms), the contribution degree of different economic variables can be quantified, making AI models meet the theoretical needs of philosophy and social sciences research. In summary, the deep integration of economic quantitative models and AI can not only enhance the scientific nature and predictive ability of philosophy and social sciences research but also provide more dynamic and refined decision-making support for policy formulation. In the future, key breakthroughs are needed in causal inference, multi-agent simulation, explainable AI, and other key technologies, while strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, data sharing, and ethical governance to promote "philosophy and social sciences AI" to become one of the core tools for national governance modernization.

In conclusion, AI application in philosophy and social sciences research has broad prospects and tremendous potential. To promote the healthy development of this field, joint efforts from multiple parties including government, universities, research institutions, and enterprises are needed to strengthen policy guidance and support, establish interdisciplinary cooperation mechanisms, improve ethics and legal norms, strengthen talent cultivation and education, promote data sharing and opening, and promote deep integration of economic quantitative models and AI. Through the implementation of these measures, the deep integration of AI and philosophy and social sciences will be promoted, injecting new vitality and momentum into philosophy and social sciences research.

References

[1] Zhang Shaojie, Li Na. Evolution and Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence Research in International Social Science Fields [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2021(8): 178-188.

[2] Zhou Lüjun, Lü Peng. "Goodness-Oriented" and "Doing Good": Algorithm Governance and the Source Participation of Social Sciences in the AI Era [J]. Seeker, 2022(1): 135-142.

[3] Chao Lemen. Analysis of AI Governance Framework and Its Humanities and Social Sciences Research Issues [J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2022, 43(5): 5-12.

[4] Liu Jiaqi, Yang Binyan. Research on Hotspots and Trends of AI and Social Science Coupling Development in China—Based on CiteSpace Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Frontiers of Data & Computing, 2022, 4(6): 77-91.

[5] Lan Jiang. Generative AI and the Historical Mission of Humanities and Social Sciences—Starting from the ChatGPT Intelligence Revolution [J]. Ideological & Theoretical Education, 2023(4): 12-18.

[6] Li Yu, Shi Chunhong, Wang Defu. ChatGPT is Here! Humanities and Social Sciences in the AI Era [J]. Writing, 2023, 43(2): 3-11.

[7] Calzada I. Artificial intelligence for social innovation: beyond the noise of algorithms and datafication [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(19): 8638.

[8] Ren Limei. Mechanism and Practice of Generative AI Empowering Philosophy and Social Sciences Research [J]. Observation and Ponderation, 2025(5): 15-25.

[9] Su Xinning, Lü Xianjing. AI Empowering Methodological Transformation in Humanities and Social Sciences Research [J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2025, 44(1): 1-10, 121.

[10] Pang Xun. Analysis of AI Empowering Social Science Research—Generative Actors, Complex Causal Analysis, and Human-Machine Research Collaboration [J]. World Economics and Politics, 2024(7): 3-30, 153.

[11] Ma Feicheng, Chen Shuaipu. Generative AI Empowering Philosophy and Social Sciences Research [J]. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2024, 77(6): 25-33.

[12] Hu Anning, Zhou Sen. Beginners Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Generative AI in Social Science Research [J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2024(1): 57-65, 242.

[13] Grossmann I, Feinberg M, Parker D C, et al. AI and the transformation of social science research [J]. Science, 2023, 380: 1108-1109.

[14] Mao Zijun, Zhu Yuqian. Review of Foreign Social Science Research Hotspots on Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 25(2): 55-67.

[15] Zheng Guangjing, Lü Peng. Generative AI and the Emergence of New Paradigms in Philosophy and Social Sciences [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2023(4): 132-142, 255.

[16] Chu Erkang, Tian Ju. Logical Construction of Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigm System Based on Generative AI [J]. Journal of Jinzhong University, 2024, 41(5): 14-19.

[17] Lin Shaofu. Scenarios, Frameworks, and Challenges of Applying AI in Social Sciences [J]. Social Research Methods Review, 2024, 6(2): 20-27.

[18] Wang Shijun. Domestic Social Science Perspective on AI Governance Research: A Literature Review [J]. Tangdu Journal, 2024, 40(4): 57-64.

[19] Liu Yanlin. Research on Optimization of Social Science Research Evaluation Based on Law Evolution and Technology Empowerment in the AI Era [J]. Hubei Social Sciences, 2025(3): 16-26.