Two Tetraploid New Species of Isoetes from China: Postprint
Shu Jiangping, Yufeng Gu, Ou Zhiguo, Shao Wen, Yang Juan, Lu Qiyong, Zhang Xianchun, Liu Baodong, Wang Ruijiang, YAN Yuehong
Submitted 2022-03-30 | ChinaXiv: chinaxiv-202204.00002

Abstract

Isoëtes is the most anciently originated genus of aquatic vascular plants, with all species listed as National First-Class Protected Plants. Through nationwide investigation and research on Isoëtes plants, significant morphological differences were found among tetraploid individuals from different localities. Based on morphological, palynological, and cytological evidence, the tetraploid populations distributed in Changsha and Huaihua regions of Hunan Province, China, are designated as Isoëtes longpingii and I. xiangfei, respectively, with their morphological characteristics described in detail. Isoëtes longpingii is morphologically similar to I. sinensis, but differs in having megaspores with small tuberculate or cristate ornamentation, and slender, delicate leaves up to 60 cm in length; this species is also similar to the hexaploid I. orientalis, differing in having 44 chromosomes and megaspores with tuberculate or cristate ornamentation. The megaspore ornamentation of I. xiangfei is similar to that of the diploid I. yunguiensis, but differs in microspore ornamentation, sporangium shape, and chromosome number. Isoëtes longpingii consists of only a few individuals growing in a pond in Ningxiang City, Hunan Province, completely submerged, whereas I. xiangfei is distributed in wetlands of Tongdao and Huitong Counties in Huaihua City. Due to the narrow distribution range of these two new species, small number of wild populations and individuals, and habitat disturbance by human activities, I. longpingii is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) and I. xiangfei as Vulnerable (VU) according to IUCN Red List criteria. The compiled dichotomous key for known Isoëtes species in China provides an important reference for the identification and conservation of species within this genus.

Full Text

Two New Tetraploid Quillwort Species, Isoëtes longpingii and I. xiangfei from China (Isoëtaceae)

Jiangping Shu¹², Yufeng Gu¹³, Zhiguo Ou⁴, Wen Shao⁵, Juan Yang⁶, Qiyong Lu⁶, Xianchun Zhang⁷, Baodong Liu³, Ruijiang Wang², Yuehong Yan¹

¹ Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, the Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, Guangdong, China
² Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
³ Life Science and Technology College, Harbin Normal University, Key Laboratory of Plant Biology in Colleges of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150025, China
⁴ Hunan Shangjie Instrument Co., Ltd., Changsha 410000, China
⁵ Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai Chenshan Plant Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201602, China
⁶ Tongdao Dong Autonomous County Forestry Bureau, Huaihua 418500, Hunan, China
⁷ State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolution Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Abstract

Two new tetraploid quillwort species, Isoëtes longpingii and I. xiangfei, from China are described and illustrated. I. longpingii is a fully submerged plant found in a small pond in Hunan Province. It is morphologically similar to I. sinensis but differs in its small, tuberculate-cristate megaspores and soft, slender leaves that grow up to 60 cm. It is also similar to the hexaploid I. orientalis but differs in having 44 chromosomes and tuberculate-cristate megaspores. I. xiangfei is most similar to the diploid I. yunguiensis in megaspore ornamentation but differs in its microspore ornamentation, oblong sporangium, and 44 chromosomes. Only a few individuals of I. longpingii occur in Ningxiang County, Hunan Province, while I. xiangfei is distributed in the wetlands of Tongdao and Huitong counties in Hunan Province. Due to their limited geographic ranges, small populations, low individual numbers, and disturbed habitats, I. longpingii and I. xiangfei are evaluated as Critically Endangered (CR) and Vulnerable (VU), respectively, according to IUCN Red List criteria. A key to all currently known Chinese quillworts is also provided to facilitate further taxonomic identification and conservation of these rare and endangered plants in China.

Keywords: new taxon, Isoëtes, lycophytes, polyploid, heterosporous, aquatic plants

Funding: This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19050404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (3217020964), the Harbin Normal University Postgraduate Innovation Project (HSDBSCX2021-01), and the Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization (OC202103).

Author Information: Jiangping Shu (1991–), Ph.D. candidate, research focus on fern phylogenomics, (E-mail) jpshu@scbg.ac.cn. *Corresponding authors: Yuehong Yan, Ph.D., Professor, research focus on fern diversity and evolution, (E-mail) yhyan@sibs.ac.cn; Ruijiang Wang, Ph.D., Professor, research focus on plant molecular systematics and evolution, (E-mail) wangrj@scbg.ac.cn

Isoëtes L. (1753: 1100) is the only extant genus of the family Isoëtaceae, with an extensive fossil record dating from the Devonian Period (Pigg, 2001; Wang et al., 2019) through rapid diversification in the Cenozoic Era (Pereira et al., 2017b, 2021; Wood et al., 2020). The genus contains approximately 250 species widely distributed from tropical to subarctic regions, inhabiting various habitats across most parts of the world (PPGI, 2016; Troia et al., 2016). However, most Isoëtes species have restricted habitats and small populations, placing them at risk of extinction (Kang et al., 2005; Liu X et al., 2005; Gentili et al., 2010; Troia et al., 2016; Brunton & Troia, 2018; Singh et al., 2021). Interestingly, hybridization and polyploidization occur frequently in Isoëtes, with more than half of known species being polyploids ranging from tetraploid to dodecaploid (Hickey, 1984; Taylor & Hickey, 1992; Liu et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2010; Pereira, 2015; Troia et al., 2016; Grigoryan et al., 2020). Although this ancient genus is widely distributed across various habitats and has a complex evolutionary history, its simple morphology—a tuft of linear sporophylls on a lobed rootstock—is remarkably similar among species, making interspecific identification difficult (Taylor & Hickey, 1992; Troia et al., 2016). Isoëtes species are predominantly distributed in the Americas, southern Europe, Africa, and Australia, with relatively few species in Asia (Troia et al., 2016; Pereira et al., 2017b, 2021; Brunton & Troia, 2018; Choi et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2021). The diversity of Isoëtes species in Asia is probably underestimated, and many cryptic species may remain unidentified (Schafran, 2019).

Characteristics such as habitat, velum, ligule, megaspore size and texture, chromosome count, and DNA sequences are generally employed to distinguish Isoëtes species (Hickey, 1986; Pereira, 2015; Troia et al., 2016). However, leaf morphology and anatomy are influenced by local environmental conditions (Liu et al., 2006; Cavalheiro-Filho et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2021). Several species have recently been described and illustrated worldwide (Mora-Olivo et al., 2016; Pereira et al., 2016, 2017a, 2019; Schafran et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2021). In China, seven species have been reported: I. yunguiensis Q.F. Wang & W.C. Taylor, I. hypsophila Hand.-Mazz., I. taiwanensis De Vol, I. shangrilaensis X. Li & Y.Q. Huang, I. baodongii Y.F. Gu, Y.H. Yan & Yi J. Lu, I. sinensis T.C. Palmer, and I. orientalis H. Liu & Q.F. Wang (Handel-Mazzetti, 1923; Palmer, 1927; De Vol, 1972; Wang et al., 2002; Liu H et al., 2005; Zhang & Taylor, 2013; Li et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2021).

We conducted extensive field surveys of the genus across China and collected tetraploid samples (2n=4x=44) previously identified as I. sinensis (2n=4x=44) that exhibited morphological and anatomical variation (Liu et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006; Dai et al., 2020, 2021). By comparing morphological features and spore texture, samples from Ningxiang and Tongdao counties in Hunan Province were found to differ from I. sinensis. Additionally, our plastid phylogenomic analysis indicated that these samples formed monophyletic clades that did not cluster with I. sinensis (Gu et al., unpublished). The sample from Ningxiang County, here named I. longpingii, resembles I. orientalis (2n=6x=66) in megaspore ornamentation, while the sample from Tongdao County, here named I. xiangfei, resembles I. yunguiensis (2n=2x=22) in megaspore ornamentation. These two new species are described and illustrated in the present study.

Materials and Methods

Isoëtes species possess prominent spore morphological characteristics, and the spore ornamentation terminology established by Hickey (1986) was used in this study. Megaspores and microspores were examined under a scanning electron microscope. Spores were mounted on double-sided adhesive tape attached to metal stubs, sputter-coated with platinum, and observed under a field emission scanning electron microscope (Quanta250; FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, U.S.A.) at 30 kV. Megaspore and microspore sizes from 3–5 individuals were measured using Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems Inc., USA).

To determine chromosome number, young root tips of sporophytes were pretreated in a saturated aqueous solution of p-dichlorobenzene for 3–5 h and subsequently fixed in Carnoy’s solution (1:3 glacial acetic acid:95% ethanol) for 1 h at 4 °C. The samples were then hydrolyzed with a mixture of 3% cellulase and 2.5% pectinase for 10 min at room temperature and stained with carbol fuchsin. Chromosomes were counted and photographed using a Carl Zeiss Axio Scope A1 photomicroscope (Jena, Germany).

Taxonomic Treatment

Isoëtes longpingii Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Gu & J.P. Shu (Fig. 1, Fig. 3: A-D)

Diagnosis: Isoëtes longpingii is similar to I. sinensis but differs in its small megaspores (310–410 μm, mean = 350 μm, n = 20) that are sparsely tuberculate-cristate [vs. larger (mean 410 µm) and densely tuberculate-cristate] and bilobed rhizome corms (vs. trilobed in I. sinensis). It is also similar to the hexaploid I. orientalis but differs in having tuberculate-cristate megaspores and 44 chromosomes (vs. 66 in I. orientalis) (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Table 1).

Type: CHINA. Hunan Province, Changsha City, Ningxiang County, Yujia'ao Village, 28°14'27.91'' N, 112°17'44.86'' E, alt. 131 m, June 15, 2019. Zhiguo Ou YYH15160 (holotype, PE!; isotype: NOCC!, IBSC!).

Description: Plants aquatic. Rhizome corms 2-lobed. Sporophylls widely spreading, 40–60 in a tuft, white at base, green above, spirally arranged, 20–60 cm long, ca. 1 mm wide, flattened on the adaxial side, rounded on the abaxial side, base flat and alate, peripheral fibrous bundles present, central intrastelar canal 4. Sporangia basal, obovate, 3.5–4.5 × 2.5–3.0 mm. Ligule cuneiform, 2.3–2.6 × 1.1–1.3 mm. Megaspores white when dry, earthy yellow when wet, 310–410 µm (mean = 350 µm, n = 20) in diameter, proximal hemisphere tuberculate, distal hemisphere echinate-cristate. Microspores gray en masse, elliptic, vertical axis length 27–30 µm (mean = 29 µm, n = 20), surface echinate. Chromosome number 2n = 4x = 44.

Distribution: Ningxiang County, Changsha City, Hunan Province.

Ecology: Submerged in a small pond; alt. 131 m.

Etymology: The specific epithet "longpingii" honors the late Prof. Long-Ping Yuan, who devoted his life to hybrid rice research in Changsha City (where the species was discovered) and greatly contributed to global food security and poverty alleviation (Wang, 2021).

IUCN Red List category: A single population of about ten individuals is found at only one location in Yujia'ao Village, Ningxiang County, Hunan Province. Isoëtes longpingii is Critically Endangered (CR) [A1a; B2ab(iv)c; C2a(ii); D(2)] according to the Red List Categories and Criteria (Subcommittee, 2019).

Fig. 1 Morphological and anatomic characteristics of Isoëtes longpingii Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Gu & J.P. Shu. A. Habit; B. Microsporangia; C. Megasporangia; D. Chromosomes (2n = 4x = 44); E. Transection of leaf; F. Ligule; G. Transection of rhizome (2-lobed).

Isoëtes xiangfei Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Gu & J.P. Shu (Fig. 2, Fig. 4: A-D)

Diagnosis: Isoëtes xiangfei is a tetraploid, morphologically similar to the diploid I. yunguiensis and the tetraploid I. sinensis in megaspore ornamentation but differs in its less reticulate, lower megaspore ornamentation and densely low-tuberculate microspores (vs. sparsely tuberculate-echinate) (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Table 1).

Type: CHINA. Hunan Province: Huaihua City, Tongdao County, 26°14′56.82″ N, 109°50′0.33″ E, alt. 298 m, December 28, 2019. Juan Yang Fern08928 (holotype: PE!; isotype: NOCC!, IBSC!).

Description: Plants aquatic. Rhizome corms 3-lobed. Sporophylls 20–60 in a tuft, widely spreading, white at the base, green above, spirally arranged, 15–35 cm long, 2–3 mm wide, flattened on the adaxial side, rounded on the abaxial side, base flat and alate, peripheral fibrous bundles present, central intrastelar canal 4. Sporangia basal, oblong, 4.4–5.0 × 2.9–3.3 mm. Ligule oval-triangular, 2.5–2.7 × 1.4–1.6 mm. Megaspores white when dry, earthy yellow when wet, 390–450 µm (mean = 430 µm, n = 20) in diameter; proximal hemisphere cristate, distal hemisphere reticulate. Microspores gray en masse, elliptic, monolete, vertical axis 26–28 µm (mean = 27 µm, n = 20), surface echinate. Chromosome number 2n = 4x = 44.

Distribution: Tongdao and Huitong counties, Huaihua City, Hunan Province.

Ecology: Wetlands and small gullies; alt. 298 m.

Etymology: The specific epithet "xiangfei" derives from the name of the Xiangfei, two revered goddesses of the Xiangjiang River in Hunan Province where this aquatic plant was discovered. "Xiang" is the longest river in Hunan Province, and "fei" means wife in Chinese. According to legend, the Xiangfei sisters married King Shun simultaneously.

IUCN Red List category: Isoëtes xiangfei occurs in Tongdao and Huitong counties, Hunan Province, with approximately 200 individuals that are well conserved by the local forestry department. It is Vulnerable (VU) [B2ab(iii); C2a(i)] according to the Red List Categories and Criteria (Subcommittee, 2019).

Fig. 2 Morphological and anatomic characteristics of Isoëtes xiangfei Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Gu & J.P. Shu. A. Habit; B. Plants with wide wing at the base of leaf; C. Microsporangia; D. Megasporangia; E. Ligule; F. Transection of rhizome (3-lobed); G. Transection of leaf; H. Chromosomes.

Fig. 3 Palynological comparison between Isoëtes longpingii and I. sinensis. A–D. Isoëtes longpingii (YYH15160). A. Proximal view of megaspore; B. Distal view of megaspore; C. Proximal view of microspore; D. Distal view of microspore. E–H. I. sinensis from China (cited from Liu et al. 2008). E. Proximal view of megaspore; F. Distal view of megaspore; G. Proximal view of microspore; H. Distal view of microspore. I–L. I. sinensis from Japan (cited from Watanabe et al. 1996). I. Proximal view of megaspore; J. Distal view of megaspore; K. Proximal view of microspore; L. Distal view of microspore. M–P. I. sinensis from Korea (cited from Takamiya 2001). M. Proximal view of megaspore; N. Distal view of megaspore; O. Proximal view of microspore; P. Distal view of microspore.

Fig. 4 Palynological comparison between Isoëtes xiangfei, I. yunguiensis and I. orientalis. A–D. Isoëtes xiangfei (Fern08928). A. Proximal view of megaspore; B. Distal view of megaspore; C. Proximal view of microspore; D. Distal view of microspore. E–H. I. yunguiensis (YYH15163). E. Proximal view of megaspore; F. Distal view of megaspore; G. Proximal view of microspore; H. Distal view of microspore. I–L. I. orientalis (Fern08748). I. Proximal view of megaspore; J. Distal view of megaspore; K. Proximal view of microspore; L. Distal view of microspore.

Table 1 Spore features of Isoëtes from China

Species Chromosome number Megaspore Microspore Ornamentation Size I. hypsophila 2n = 2x = 22 Levigate 290–400 µm I. shangrilaensis 2n = 2x = 22 Tuberculate-rugulate 207.25–273.09 µm (mean = 244.71 µm) I. yunguiensis 2n = 2x = 22 Cristate-reticulate 340–430 µm (mean = 390 µm) I. taiwanensis 2n = 2x = 22 Tuberculate-cristate 280–340 µm (mean = 312 µm) I. sinensis 2n = 4x = 44 Cristate 340–450 µm (mean = 409 µm) I. orientalis 2n = 6x = 66 Cristate-reticulate 350–460 µm (mean = 420 µm) I. baodongii 2n = 2x = 22 Echinate-cristate 290–400 µm (mean = 358 µm) I. longpingii 2n = 4x = 44 Tuberculate-cristate 310–410 µm (mean = 350 µm) I. xiangfei 2n = 4x = 44 Cristate-reticulate 390–450 µm (mean = 430 µm)

Note: Data for I. hypsophila, I. yunguiensis, I. taiwanensis, I. sinensis, and I. orientalis were cited from Liu et al. (2008). Data for I. shangrilaensis and I. baodongii were cited from Li et al. (2019) and Lu et al. (2021), respectively.

Key to Isoëtes of China

  1. Individual diploid → 2
  2. Individual polyploid → 6
  3. Megaspore levigate or just tuberculate-regulate → 3
  4. Megaspore with various types of ornamentation → 4
  5. Leaves 2–5 cm long, microspores echinate → I. hypsophila
  6. Leaves 3–18 cm long, microspores echinate to cristate → I. shangrilaensis
  7. Megaspore tuberculate-cristate, just distributing in Taiwan → I. taiwanensis
  8. Megaspore echinate or cristate-reticulate → 5
  9. Microspore echinate, distributing in Zhejiang → I. baodongii
  10. Microspore levigate-granulate, distributing in Yunnan and Guizhou → I. yunguiensis
  11. Leaves ca. 1 mm wide at mid-length → 7
  12. Leaves 2–3 mm wide at mid-length → I. xiangfei
  13. Megaspore ornamentation cristate-reticulate, chromosome number 66 → I. orientalis
  14. Megaspore without reticulate ornamentation, chromosome number 44 → 8
  15. Rhizome 2-lobed, megaspore 310–410 µm (mean = 350 µm) → I. longpingii
  16. Rhizome 3-lobed, megaspore 340–450 µm (mean = 409 µm) → I. sinensis

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Xun-Lin Yu from Central South University of Forestry & Technology for assistance with field surveys, and Prof. Qin-Er Yang and Prof. Yun-Fei Deng from South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences for assistance with correction of Latin names. We also thank TopEdit (www.topeditsci.com) for linguistic assistance during manuscript preparation.

References

Brunton D, Troia A. 2018. Global review of recent taxonomic research into Isoetes (Isoetaceae), with implications for biogeography and conservation. Fern Gaz 20(8): 309–333.

Cavalheiro-Filho SL, Gestinari LM, Konno TU, et al. 2021. Morphological plasticity in the endemic Isoëtes species from Serra dos Carajás, Amazonia, Brazil. Amer Fern J 111(3): 174–195.

Choi HK, Jung J, Na HR, et al. 2018. Molecular phylogeny and the biogeographic origin of East Asian Isoëtes (Isoëtaceae). Korean J Plant Taxon 48(4): 249–259.

Dai X, Li X, Huang Y, et al. 2020. The speciation and adaptation of the polyploids: a case study of the Chinese Isoetes L. diploid-polyploid complex. BMC Evol Biol 20(1): 118.

Dai X, Yang Y, Liu X. 2021. Transplanting experiment and transcriptome sequencing reveal the potential ecological adaptation to plateau environments in the allopolyploid Isoetes sinensis. Aquat Bot 172: 103394.

De Vol CE. 1972. Isoetes found on Taiwan. Taiwania 17: 1–7.

Gentili R, Abeli T, Rossi G, et al. 2010. Population structure and genetic diversity of the threatened quillwort Isoëtes malinverniana and implication for conservation. Aquat Bot 93(3): 147–152.

Grigoryan MY, Bobrov AA, Brunton DF, et al. 2020. Next generation DNA sequencing reveals allopolyploid origin of decaploid Isoëtes lacustris (Isoëtaceae). Aquat Bot 170: 103326.

Handel-Mazzetti H. 1923. Isoëtes hypsophila Hand.-Mzt. Akad Wiss Wien 13: 95.

Hickey RJ. 1984. Chromosome numbers of neotropical Isoëtes. Amer Fern J 74(1): 9–13.

Hickey RJ. 1986. Isoëtes megaspore surface morphology: nomenclature, variation, and systematic importance. Amer Fern J 76(1): 1–16.

Kang M, Ye Q, Huang H. 2005. Genetic consequence of restricted habitat and population decline in endangered Isoetes sinensis (Isoetaceae). Ann Bot 96(7): 1265–1274.

Kim C, Shin H, Chang YT, et al. 2010. Speciation pathway of Isoëtes (Isoëtaceae) in East Asia inferred from molecular phylogenetic relationships. Amer J Bot 97(6): 958–969.

Li X, Huang Y, Dai X, et al. 2019. Isoetes shangrilaensis, a new species of Isoetes from Hengduan mountain region of Shangri-la, Yunnan. Phytotaxa 397(1): 65–73.

Liu H, Wang QF, Taylor WC. 2005. Isoetes orientalis (Isoetaceae), a new hexaploid quillwort from China. Novon 15(1): 164–167.

Liu H, Wang QF, Taylor WC. 2006. Morphological and anatomical variation in sporophylls of Isoetes sinensis Palmer (Isoetaceae), an endangered quillwort in China. Amer Fern J 96(3): 71–79.

Liu X, Gituru WR, Wang QF. 2004. Distribution of basic diploid and polyploid species of Isoetes in East Asia. J Biogeogr 31(8): 1239–1250.

Liu X, Wang JY, Wang QF. 2005. Current status and conservation strategies for Isoetes in China: a case study for the conservation of threatened aquatic plants. Oryx 39(3): 335–338.

Lu YJ, Gu YF, Yan YH. 2021. Isoetes baodongii (Isoetaceae), a new basic diploid quillwort from China. Novon 29: 206–210.

Mora-Olivo A, Mendoza-Ruiz A, Martinez-Avalos JG. 2016. Isoetes tamaulipana (Isoetaceae), a new species from Mexico. Phytotaxa 267(2): 113–120.

Palmer TC. 1927. A Chinese Isoetes. Amer Fern J 17: 111–113.

Pereira JB. 2015. Studies on chromosome numbers and spore size in Brazilian Isoëtes. Amer Fern J 105(3): 226–237.

Pereira JB, Salino A, Arruda A, et al. 2016. Two new species of Isoetes (Isoetaceae) from northern Brazil. Phytotaxa 272(2): 141–148.

Pereira JB, Stützel T, Schulz C. 2017a. Isoetes nana, a new species from the coastal mountains of southeastern Brazil. PhytoKeys 89: 91–105.

Pereira JB, Labiak PH, Stützel T, et al. 2017b. Origin and biogeography of the ancient genus Isoëtes with focus on the Neotropics. Bot J Linn Soc 185(2): 253–271.

Pereira JB, Guimaraes JTF, Watanabe MT. 2019. Isoetes dubsii and Isoetes santacruzensis, two new species from lowland areas in South America. PhytoKeys 131: 1–16.

Pereira JB, Giulietti AM, Prado J, et al. 2021. Plastome-based phylogenomics elucidate relationships in rare Isoëtes species groups from the Neotropics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 161: 107–118.

Pigg KB. 2001. Isoetalean lycopsid evolution: from the Devonian to the present. Amer Fern J 91(3): 99–114.

PPGI. 2016. A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. J Syst Evol 54(6): 563–603.

Schafran PW. 2019. Molecular systematics of Isoëtes (Isoëtaceae) in eastern North America. Ph.D. dissertation. Norfolk: Old Dominion University.

Schafran PW, Leonard SW, Bray RD, et al. 2016. Isoetes mississippiensis: A new quillwort from Mississippi, USA. PhytoKeys 74: 97–106.

Singh SK, Shukla PK, Brunton DF, et al. 2021. The taxonomy and conservation status of Isoetes (Isoetaceae; Lycopodiopsida) in India. Bot Lett 168(2): 200–226.

Subcommittee ISAP. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed: 6 January 2020).

Taylor WC, Hickey RJ. 1992. Habitat, evolution, and speciation in Isoetes. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 79(3): 613–622.

Troia A, Pereira JB, Kim C, et al. 2016. The genus Isoetes (Isoetaceae): a provisional checklist of the accepted and unresolved taxa. Phytotaxa 277(2): 101–145.

Wang D, Qin M, Liu L, et al. 2019. The most extensive Devonian fossil forest with small lycopsid trees bearing the earliest stigmarian roots. Curr Biol 29(16): 2604–2615.

Wang K. 2021. Yuan Longping (1930–2021). Nat Plants 7(7): 858–859.

Wang QF, Liu X, Taylor WC, et al. 2002. Isoetes yunguiensis (Isoetaceae), a new basic diploid quillwort from China. Novon 12: 587–591.

Wood D, Besnard G, Beerling DJ, et al. 2020. Phylogenomics indicates the "living fossil" Isoetes diversified in the Cenozoic. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0227525.

Zhang LB, Taylor WC. 2013. Isoëtaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, editors. Flora of China, Vol. 2–3 (Pteridophytes). Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. p. 35–36.

Submission history